- 1、本文档共184页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
MPLS流量工程汇
MPLS TE TOI eosborne@ Agenda How MPLS TE works What Code Is MPLS TE In? Platform Issues in Implementation Lab Demo - config How MPLS TE Works Prerequisites How MPLS-TE Works Basic Configuration Knobs! Knobs! Knobs! Deploying and Designing Prerequisites You should already understand… How to configure a Cisco router Basic MPLS concepts like push/pop/swap, EXP, and LFIB How a link-state routing protocol works Basic QoS mechanisms like MDRR and LLQ Agenda Prerequisites How MPLS-TE Works Basic Configuration Knobs! Knobs! Knobs! Deploying and Desiginig How MPLS-TE Works How MPLS-TE Works What good is MPLS-TE? Information Distribution Path Calculation Path Setup Forwarding Traffic Down A Tunnel What Good Is MPLS-TE? There are two kinds of networks Those that have plenty of bandwidth everywhere Those with congestion in some places, but not in others The first kind always evolve into the second kind! What Good Is MPLS-TE? MPLS-TE introduces a 3rd kind: Those that have plenty of bandwidth everywhere Those with congestion in some places, but not in others Those that use all of their bandwidth to its maximum efficiency, regardless of shortest-path routing! What Good Is MPLS-TE? Multi Protocol Label Switching - Traffic Engineering Information Distribution You need a link-state protocol as your IGP IS-IS or OSPF Link-state requirement is only for MPLS-TE! Not a requirement for VPNs, etc! Need for a Link-State Protocol Why do I need a link-state protocol? To make sure info gets flooded To build a picture of the entire network Need for a Link-State Protocol Consider the following network: - All links have a cost of 10 - RtrA’s path to RtrE is A-B-E, cost 20 - All traffic from A to {E,F,G} goes A-B-E What a DV Protocol Sees RtrA doesn’t see all the links RtrA only knows about the shortest path This is by design What a LS Protocol Sees RtrA sees all links RtrA only computes the shortest path Routing table doesn’t change The Problem With Shortest-Path Some links are DS3,
文档评论(0)