- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
观影消费者权益保护研究——以陈晓梅诉博纳影城案为例word格式论文
AbstractAs more and more consumers go into the cinema, the cinema advertisement also becomes a new focus that movie consumers are concerned about. Before the start of the movie, the frequent cinema advertisements of commodities, medicines, clothing and beverages and so on make many movie consumers annoyed. The complaints the consumer association has received are growing, which even gives rise to lawsuits. At present, the relevant laws and regulations on specification of cinema advertising are insufficient and it is very hard for the movie consumers to seek a reasonable way to protect their own rights. Therefore, the issue of rights protection is imminent. We should pay more attention to the protection of the consumers’ rights and the ways in which we can achieve low cost and high efficiency.This paper starts with the analysis of relevant judicial cases and uses the method of literature review, case contrast and empirical analysis. With the comprehensive reference to the domestic scholars’ academic viewpoints, it analyzes the problems in the process of protecting the consumers’ rights in four parts. It makes a preliminary discussion on what specific consumer rights are violated, the ways of movie consumers’ rights protection and the establishment of public interest litigation mechanisms. In addition to the introduction, the main body of the paper includes four parts.The first part is the summary of the case. An understanding of the background, reasons, process and result of the case in which the plaintiff lawyer Chen Xiaomei’s legitimate rights are violated can help us seek a better solution to the issue of rights protection.The second part addresses the legal controversial points in this case. The specific rights of movie consumers that are prescribed in the economic law and are violated by cinema advertisements are the focuses of this dispute. These rights include the consumers’ rights of their access to information and their rights of fair dealing. What is corresp
您可能关注的文档
- 股权结构与财务报告质量对过度投资影响问题的实证分析word格式论文.docx
- 股权结构对债务期限结构影响的分析--基于我国制造业a股上市公司的数据word格式论文.docx
- 股权结构与安全会计信息披露的相关性分析——基于沪深两市2013年的经验数据word格式论文.docx
- 股权结构 高管薪酬对内部控制有效性影响分析word格式论文.docx
- 股权投资尽职调查中的董事义务法律问题分析word格式论文.docx
- 股权投资 企业债务融资与企业信用风险——基于新三板挂牌企业数据的实证分析word格式论文.docx
- 股权控制路径 代理冲突与外部审计需求的实证分析word格式论文.docx
- 股权结构与经营绩效关系实证研究—基于不同类别旅游上市公司经验数据word格式论文.docx
- 股权性质 代理成本与碳信息披露质量——来自重污染行业的经验证据word格式论文.docx
- 股权转让限制的立法问题分析——对《公司法》第72条的探讨word格式论文.docx
文档评论(0)