Right of Conscience - Christian Medical Dental …:良知的基督教医疗和牙科….ppt

Right of Conscience - Christian Medical Dental …:良知的基督教医疗和牙科….ppt

  1. 1、本文档共45页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
RightofConscience-ChristianMedical

* * Critique of: ACOG Committee Opinion # 385, November 2007 The Limits of Conscientious Refusal in Reproductive Medicine A. This detailed opinion on the right of conscience contains several flawed assumptions: 1. Patient autonomy is the final arbiter of treatment decisions ? For several hundred years, physician beneficence was believed by all to be the final arbiter of treatment decisions. This was meant to reflect the generally accepted belief that whatever the physician felt was in the patient’s best interest was what should be done. ? In western medicine, this imbalance began to change in the 1960’s and 1970’s such that patient autonomy, i.e., the right to self-determination, was appropriately accorded much greater weight. ? Currently, patient autonomy is felt to outweigh the physician’s concept of patient beneficence in most instances. But patient autonomy is not absolute. There are times when the physician’s exercise of beneficent care is supported and even lauded, e.g., o treatment and prevention of suicide o imposition of life-saving treatment when a patient has made an irrational refusal o imposed isolation of a contagious patient who endangers society o imposed immunizations. ? This flawed assumption is exemplified when ACOG states “[a]lthough respect for conscience is important, conscientious refusals should be limited if…[4 broad criteria offered].” The criteria offered are overly broad and biased. (see critique below) While equally, physician autonomy is not absolute, this tipping of the balance so strongly in favor of the patient based on assertions is ethically troubling. 2. Negative patient autonomy (the right to refuse) and positive patient autonomy (the right to demand) are morally equivalent ? Negative patient autonomy is nearly inviolable; it is rarely justified to impose unwanted treatment (see above for examples). ? However, positive patient autonomy carries much less moral weight. Patient demands are routinely denied by conscientio

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

138****7331 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档