国际体育纠纷解决机制困境与出路穆图系列案法理分析.docVIP

国际体育纠纷解决机制困境与出路穆图系列案法理分析 　　摘 要：穆图系列案件是国际体育纠纷解决的经典案例，该系列案件前后持续了11年，经历了一个完整的国际体育纠纷解决过程。从案例分析的角度出发，对国际体育纠纷机制存在的困境进行法理分析，即国际体育纠纷解决机构管辖权的交叉、“一事不再理”原则的缺位、体育仲裁裁决的司法审查与体育仲裁自治及体育特殊性冲突、体育纠纷解决机构的决定和裁决的执行不力；并提出对策： 1）应先用尽体育行会的内部救济，再根据事先或者事后订立的仲裁协议申请体育仲裁机构进行仲裁或者调解；2）应完善通知制度和案件关联性审查制度，以保证“一事不再理”原则的适用，有效节约司法资源，提高国际体育纠纷解决的效率；3）司法审查与体育特殊性和体育仲裁自治的冲突，司法审查必须在尽量尊重体育特殊性和体育仲裁自治的前提下，审慎地进行公共政策方面的审理；4） 必须采用经济惩罚手段与纪律处罚方式相济的方式，保证国际体育纠纷解决机构决定和裁决的权威性。 　　关键词：国际体育纠纷；国际体育纠纷解决机制；体育仲裁；管辖权；一事不再理；司法审查；法理分析；执行 　　中图分类号：G 80-05 文章编号：1009-783X（2017）05-0411-05 文献标识码：A 　　Abstract： The series of Mutu Cases is a kind of classic case of international sports dispute settlement， which lasted for 11 years， and experienced a complete international sports dispute settlement procedure. From the perspective of case analysis， the present research makes a legal analysis on the dilemma of international sports dispute mechanism， namely， the overlapping jurisdiction of the international sports dispute settlement mechanism， the lack of the non bis in idem principle， the conflict between the judicial review of international sports arbitration， sports autonomy and sports specificity and the weak enforcement of the arbitrations or decisions made by the sports dispute settlement bodies， and puts forward the following countermeasures： 1） internal remedy of sports associations should be exhausted before the application of arbitration or mediation in sports arbitration institutions according to prior or subsequent arbitration agreement； 2） the notification system and the related case review system should be improved to ensure the application of non bis in idem principle and effective use of judicial resources， and to improve the efficiency of international sports disputes； 3） the conflict between judicial review and sports specificity and sports arbitration autonomy should be considered， and judicial review should conduct prudent trial of the public policy issues on the premise of sports specificity and respect the autonomy of