医疗与法律项目案例讨论6遗体之使用及归属权-国立高雄科技大学第.pptVIP

  • 1
  • 0
  • 约9.28千字
  • 约 40页
  • 2019-02-15 发布于天津
  • 举报

医疗与法律项目案例讨论6遗体之使用及归属权-国立高雄科技大学第.ppt

医疗与法律项目案例讨论6遗体之使用及归属权-国立高雄科技大学第.ppt

To the extent that any right exists, it is, in general, merely a right to possession. Id. That right exists solely “for the limited purpose of determining who shall have its custody for burial.” Sinai Temple v. Kaplan, 54 Cal.App.3d 1103, 1110, 127 Cal.Rptr. 80, 85 (1976) Californias statutory scheme reflects all of that. It decidedly does not confer a property right upon anyone. Assuming that a decedent has not made his own arrangements for disposal of his own earthly remains,FN1 the state makes sure that somebody else will both do so and pay for it. To that end, California has provided th

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档