- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Beyond physical harm “Thus protection and full security (sometimes full protection and security) can apply to more than physical security of an investor or its property, because either could be subject to harassment without being physically harmed or seized.” Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. Argentina (=Vivendi II), Award 2007, para. 7.4.17. Beyond physical harm “[T]he obligation to provide full protection and security is wider than “physical” protection and security. It is difficult to understand how the physical security of an intangible asset would be achieved. In the instant case, “security” is qualified by “legal”. In its ordinary meaning “legal security” has been defined as “the quality of the legal system which implies certainty in its norms and, consequently, their foreseeable application.” Siemens A.G. v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/08, Award, 6 February 2007, para. 303. Violations of FET - Abuse of Power / Coercion As both sides agree, the volume of the requested documents was large, a number of truckloads; moving them would be a substantial and disruptive burden. The SLD simply advised the Investment that the proposal to conduct verification in Portland was “not acceptable”, but gave no reasons why. Pope Talbot v. Canada, NAFTA, 10 April 2002, para. 172. (the Verification Review Episode violated 1105) FET的违反:滥用权力/强制 “双方同意,要求的文件数量达数卡车之多;运送这些文件将会是一个重大而不便的负担。SLD仅通知投资(者)在波特兰当地进行审核“不可接受”,但未给出原因。” Pope Talbot v. Canada, NAFTA, 10 April 2002, para. 172.() Violations of FET - Abuse of Power / Interference “In the Arbitral Tribunal’s view, the Republic’s public statements at this time constituted an unwarranted interference in this. ” “That the following conduct attributable to the Republic constituted violations of the fair and equitable treatment standard: (i) the public announcement on behalf of the Republic of the termination of the Lease Contract on 13 May 2005;[…]” “The Republic, in effect, interfered with and accelerated the
文档评论(0)