侵权法上违反安全保障义务认定与责任承担的合理限度.pdfVIP

万方数据 侵权法上违反安全保障义务认定及责任承担的合理限度 摘 要 随着我国经济和社会的发展，社会生活中法律关系日益复杂。宾 馆、商场、银行等公共场所的管理人或者群众性活动的组织者，未尽 到安全保障义务，造成他人损害的纠纷日益增多。对这一问题各方争 执观点较多。2009 年《侵权责任法》的出台引出了更多需要讨论的 新争议和值得讨论的新视角。这些讨论无疑将就先前法官对安全保障 义务的认识不一、法院做出裁决的理由与结果各异的现象给予积极的 改善，对于法律的严明公正具有深远的意义。 本文以“合理限度”为视角，对安全保障义务的概念、该规定在 各国（地区）就合理限度问题的比较、我国侵权法上安全保障义务认 定及违反安全保障义务侵权责任承担的合理限度等进行了初步的探 讨，就先前学者的研究给出了不同的观点。期望能更好地完善我国的 安全保障义务制度，从而在现实生活中更好地保护人身和财产安全， 同时在司法审判中给予受害人最大限度的合理保障。 关键词：安全保障义务，侵权责任法，合理限度，认定，责任承担 万方数据 THEREASONABLE LIMITOFDETERMINATION AND LIABILITY OFOBLIGATIONOFSAFETY GUARANTEE ABSTRACT With the development of society and economy in our country, legal relations in social activities are more and more complicated. The public places supervisorsof hotels, malls, banks and others related，orthe mass activitys organizershave not performed the obligation of safetyguarantee, and recently hurt more and more people .We can find lots of different views on this matters of law. The Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China was enforced, at the same time, more and more new disputes aroused and we can see this legal system from some new angles of view. They will no doubt improve the phenomena that judges have different understandings about the obligation of safety guarantee and courts give judgments with different reasons and results. Moreover, all of these will greatlyaffecttheauthorityandjustice oflaw. This article with the angle of view of “reasonable limit”, preliminarily researches the concept of obligation of safety guarantee, comparison of different reasonable limit of this obligation in different countries or areas, the reasonable limit of its determination and