国际贸易实务双语教程课件傅龙海 ISBN9787566300713 PPT九2011国贸双语Chapter 9.ppt

下载文档

4
0
约1.03万字
约 31页
2019-07-04 发布于广东
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

国际贸易实务双语教程课件傅龙海 ISBN9787566300713 PPT九2011国贸双语Chapter 9.ppt

1、本文档共31页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Case Study Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 1: A Chinese importer had concluded a contract with a foreign company to import chemical products, however the foreign seller found he would be at a lose as the price of the products in the international market was rising. So he required to cancel the contract due to Force Majeure. Then as the Chinese importer, how to deal with the situation? Case 2: An institute in China signed an import contract with a Japanese seller to buy a set of precision appliance. It was stipulated to make delivery on Sep. in contract, but the Japanese government declared the kind of appliance was high-tech product which’s prohibited for export on 7th Sep and the regulation come into effect 7 days after the declaration. Then the Japanese buyer required removing the contract due to force majeure. Question: Is the requirement of Japanese seller reasonable? How to settle the matter as the Chinese buyer? Case 3: A Chinese importer has signed a contract with Iran company on 2nd November, 1990 in term of FOB. Due to the Gulf War breaking out, the ship of Chinese side cannot reach Iran port until the end of the Gulf War on April of 1991. The seller claimed for the compensation against us for the storage expense, is it reasonable? Case 4: A Chinese exporter made an offer of farm products in 1500 M/T to a British company at 348 Pounds per M/T CFR London with the total amount of GBP522000 and the delivery time of May-SEP. of the year. After the conclusion of the contract, there was a natural disaster in China (flood). Thus, the Chinese seller required to be free from the commitment of supply due to Force Majeure, but the buyer refused it saying that they got into a loss of GBP150000 due to the exporter’s failure of delivery as the market price of the product has risen for 8%, and claimed for the concerning compensation. The Chinese exporter didn’t agree with him. Finally, the both sides agreed to settle the dispute