垂直连续电镀设备(VCP)取代龙门电镀线的必然趋势.pptVIP

GuangDe Dongwei Plating Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. 广德东威电镀设备技术有限公司 Jianbo Liu 刘建波 Trend of Replacement from Gantry Plating Equipment to Vertical Continuous Plating Equipment垂直连续电镀设备（VCP）取代龙门电镀线的必然趋势 Advantage-自主研发，技术领先 Comparison Based on: Safety PK, Economy PK, Products Quality PK, etc. 对比基于：安全性对比，经济性对比，电镀产品质量对比等 Capacity per month：47,500 m2 月产能47,500 m2； Panel plating Cu thickness：0.4 mil 面铜厚度：10um； Working hours and days: 22 hours per day and 26 days per month 每天生产22 小时，每月生产26天; Calculation：计算 Hoist—12 plating units，width=4.2 m，3 sets transporter 龙门线 – 12缸，宽度4.2米，3台天车 VCP— 12Cu, V=2.18 m/min VCP12个铜槽，传动速度2.18米/分钟 VCP vs Hoist Type Plating - VCP与龙门电镀对比 Big fire risks exist in the hoist type plating equipments and many fire hazards are shown on the TVs 龙门线存在较大的火灾风险，而龙门线起火事故在电视中屡见报道 VCP equipments contains special fire-proof design and minimize human factors for fire hazards. Currently no any fire hazard happens。 VCP设备具有专门的防火设计，能够最大程度地减少火灾风险。迄今为止，东威公司生产的VCP设备没有发生过一起火灾； VCP vs Hoist Type Plating – Fire Hazards Risks火灾风险 VCP equipment VCP电镀线 Full sealed working environment and no bad smells 外觀整潔、全封閉式設計，工作環境良好，可实现四季恒溫控制 Hoist type equipment Noisy, open with bad smells and plates are easy to drop when adding copper 傳統龍門電鍍，環境嘈雜，敞口式設計，（不利于消防喷淋设施）化學品極易揮發，易發生墜落意外 VCP vs Hoist Type Plating – Operator Safety 员工安全 Equipment type 设备类型 Consumption 耗材 Copper Consumption 铜球消耗 Capacity/m^2 产量 Total consumption 总消耗量 Hoist type 龙门线 Copper 磷铜球 25 Kg/100 m2 47,500 11.875 T VCP 21.3 Kg/100 m2 47,500 10.1174 T Reason for copper saving: uniformity improvement 省铜理由：均匀性提高 VCP VS Hoist Type Plating – Economy 节约磷铜球 Hoist type plating 龙门线 VCP Number of people人工数 Cost/month/person人员月工资 Total cost/month每月成本 Number of people人工数 Cost/month/person人员月工资 Total cost/month每月成本 Loading/unloading 上下料 3 3500 10500 0 3500 0 Dry 产品吹干 2 3500 7000 0 3500 0 On-line inspection巡检 1 3500 3500 1 3500 3500 Maintain 维护 1 3500 3500 0.5 3500 1750 Total cost/8hours总成本 24500 RMB 5250 RMB VCP-R