- 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
硕士研究生英语模拟试题及一
硕士研究生英语模拟试题及一
PAGE / NUMPAGES
硕士研究生英语模拟试题及一
硕士研究生英语模拟试题及答案一
Section I Use of English
Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
People are, on the whole, poor at considering background information when making individual decisions. At first glance this might seem like a strength that 1 the ability to make judgments which are unbiased by 2 factors. But Dr. Uri Simonsohn speculated that an inability to consider the big 3 was leading decision-makers to be biased by the daily samples of information they were working with. 4 , he theorised that a judge 5 of appearing too soft 6 crime might be more likely to send someone to prison 7 he had already sentenced five or six other defendants only to forced community service on that day.
To 8 this idea, he turned to the university-admissions process. In theory, the 9 of an applicant should not depend on the few others 10 randomly for interview during the same day, but Dr. Simonsohn suspected the truth was 11 .
He studied the results of 9,323 MBA interviews 12 by 31 admissions officers. The interviewers had 13 applicants on a scale of one to five. This scale 14 numerous factors into consideration. The scores were 15 used in
conjunction with an applicant’s score on the Graduate Management
Admission Test, or GMAT, a standardized exam which is 16 out of 800 points, to make a decision on whether to accept him or her.
Dr. Simonsohn found if the score of the previous candidate in a daily series of interviewees was 0.75 points or more higher than that of the one 17 that, then the score for the next applicant would 18 by an average of
0.075 points. This might sound small, but to 19 the effects of such a decrease a candidate could need 30 more GMAT points than would otherwise have been 20 .
[A]grants [B]submits [C]transmits [D]delivers
[A]minor [B]objective [C]crucial [D] external
[A]issue [B]vision [C]picture [D]external
[A] For e
您可能关注的文档
- 硕士研究生入学考试建筑学基础.docx
- 硕士研究生复试神经病学复习题.docx
- 硕士研究生学位档案材料清单(2019版).docx
- 硕士研究生定向协议.docx
- 硕士研究生导师简介表荐.doc
- 硕士研究生毕业自我鉴定5篇.docx
- 硕士研究生结业申请书.docx
- 硕士研究生英语模拟题及二.docx
- 硕士研究生读书报告考核表.docx
- 硕导遴选办法.docx
- 2025年贵州工业职业技术学院高职单招高职单招英语2016-2024历年频考点试题含答案解析.docx
- 2025年西昌民族幼儿师范高等专科学校高职单招职业适应性测试近5年常考版参考题库含答案解析.docx
- 2025年西藏警官高等专科学校高职单招语文2018-2024历年参考题库频考点含答案解析.docx
- 2025年贵州工商职业学院高职单招职业技能测试近5年常考版参考题库含答案解析.docx
- 2025年贵州工商职业学院高职单招职业适应性测试近5年常考版参考题库含答案解析.docx
- 2025年贵州农业职业学院高职单招数学历年(2016-2024)频考点试题含答案解析.docx
- 2025年贵州工商职业学院高职单招高职单招英语2016-2024历年频考点试题含答案解析.docx
- 2025年贵州工商职业学院高职单招语文2018-2024历年参考题库频考点含答案解析.docx
- 2025年许昌职业技术学院高职单招数学历年(2016-2024)频考点试题含答案解析.docx
- 2025年许昌职业技术学院高职单招职业技能测试近5年常考版参考题库含答案解析.docx
最近下载
- 小公司组织架构图及部门职责(4篇).pdf VIP
- 2020新译林版高中英语选修三全册课文翻译(英汉对照).pdf
- 2020新译林版高中英语选修第二册全册课文翻译(英汉对照).doc
- The Blair Witch Project《女巫布莱尔(1999)》完整中英文对照剧本.docx VIP
- 17J02 重庆市建设工程施工现场安全设施标准二 双排扣件式脚手架 DJBT-088-2017.docx VIP
- 2020新译林版高中英语选修第一册课文翻译(英汉对照).docx
- 渝22J01 建设工程施工现忱高处坠落生命线设置标准图集 DJBT50-155.docx VIP
- NICE3000-故障代码.pdf VIP
- 17J01 重庆市建设工程施工现场安全设施标准一 水平防护棚 DJBT-087-2017.docx VIP
- 第二次全国污染源普查生活污染源产排污系数手册(试用版).pdf
文档评论(0)