雅思满分作文赏析.docxVIP

Cambridge11

TEST1

Governmentsshouldspendmoneyonrailwaysratherthanroads.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisstatement?

话题和题型分类

政府类、同意不同意类型

题目分析

轨道交通VS道路交通

满分范文赏析

Moreoftenthannot,“gettingsomewhere”isusedmetaphoricallytomean“gettingwhatonewants”,butinthecontextofever-expandingcitiesandover-crowdedtrafficconditions,thetermhascometomeanaheadacheforcommutersandgovernmentsalike.Thus,thechoicebetween“roadsorrailways”hascometotheattentionofauthorities,andthisessaybelievesthattheutilizationofpublictransport,exemplifiedbyrailways,shouldbeencouragedwheneverpossible.

?

内容

详细条目

段落

此段结构

1引出话题

2阐述个人观点

此段功能

首段开篇摆明观点:无论如何轨道交通都应该被鼓励

Obviously,thelesstrafficthereisontheroads,themoreefficienttransportationoperates,andthelesspollutedtheenvironmentis.Eventhoughonecandisputethattheroadsystemwasplanneddecadesago,andwasnotmeantfortheincreasingvolumeofvehiclesasasignoflifeimprovement,itisjustbecauseprivatevehicleownershipisprevalent,androadsystemcannotbebetteredatwill,thatpublictransport,i.e.railwaysdesignedtocarryamultitudeofpassengersandtransportthematahighspeed,shouldbeencouraged.Consequently,withlessroadtraffic,exhaustemissionswillbedramaticallyreduced,andacleanerenvironmentisreadilyathand.

内容

详细条目

段落

此段结构

1反面论据一：道路交通会污染环境，也会造成交通拥堵

此段功能

本段是文章第二段，说了道路交通的缺点

However,theterm“wheneverpossible”intheopeningparagraphdoescarrysomeweight.Fornewlydevelopedregions,especiallythosewithasmallorslowincreaseinpopulationandtrafficintheforeseeablefuture,roadscanbeamorepragmaticmediumoftransportwhencomparedwithrailroads,undergroundornot,whichareconsiderablymoreexpensiveandlessadaptable.

内容

详细条目

段落

此段结构

1让步说明轨道交通有些情况下也不适用

此段功能

本段是文章第三段，转折让步引出特殊的情况

Railways,fortheirpassengercapacityandspeediness,arenodoubtamoresensiblesolutiontocongest