- 5
- 0
- 约2.11千字
- 约 3页
- 2025-05-07 发布于北京
- 举报
Manypeoplethinkartsuchaspaintingandmusiccannotdirectlyimprovepeoplesqualityoflife,andthereforethegovernmentshouldnotspendmoneyinthisfield.Doyouagreeordisagree?
Itissometimesarguedthatarthasnothingtodowithaperson’squalityoflife,anditshouldnotbefundedbythegovernment.Personally,Icompletelydisagreewiththisview.
Tobeginwith,Ibelieveartcanenhancepeople’swell-beinginadirectway.Mostpeopleinmodernsocietyhaveafastpaceoflife.Artservesasagreatformofrelaxationandhelpsthemtotakeabreakfromtheirdailyroutine.Acaseinpointisthatappreciatingapaintingorlisteningtoapieceofpopularmusiccanbeaneffectivestressrelieverforthosewithdemandingjobs.
Inaddition,Ibelievethatpublicexpenditureinthisfieldisnecessary.Firstly,manypeople,especiallyyoungsters,arenotabletoaffordtovisitmuseumsorgalleriesortoattendplaysorconcertsbecauseofthehighpriceoftickets.Publicsubsidiescanensurethattheartsremainavailableandopentoall,regardlessofincomeorsocialclass.Thismakesartmoreaccessibleandenablespeopletohaveabetterunderstandingoflocalcultures.
Secondly,publicfundingpromotesculturaldiversity.Someartformsareculturalheritagebutarenotwelcomedbythemarket.Formaximumprofits,relatedcompaniesareforcedintoproducingwhathasproventobepopular.Artsubsidiesfrompublicsectorsallowartiststofocusonartcreation.Thishelpstopassonartformsfromonegenerationtothenext,reducingthelossoflocalcultures.
Inconclusion,therearereasonstobelievethatartplaysavitalroleinpeople’sdailylife,anditisnecessaryandwisetomakepublicinvestmentinthisfield.
agreatformofrelaxation
appreciatingapainting
apieceofpopularmusic
effectivestressreliever
demandingjobs
Publicsubsidies
regardlessofincomeorsocialclass
moreaccessible
culturaldiversi
原创力文档

文档评论(0)