GRE写作笔记 韦晓亮.docxVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
GRE写作笔记 韦晓亮Argument的写作特点 C conclusion A attitude E evidenceArgument 的整体结构 第一段 开头 归纳论点论据(题目中关键字句的改写或提炼)指明逻辑漏洞的个数(少而精,非全部,一种错误找全按顺序说) 第二-四段 正文 分类攻击各个逻辑错误(独立和组合) 第五段 结尾 归纳总结三.如何写开头(考察归纳思路)C conclusion E evidence F logical flaws 找出C是重点:80%段首尾 10%中有标记hence (为我所用)10% 旧结论 新结论(被攻击)四.开头段的具体写法Merely base on the unformed assumption and dubious (suspicious) evidence, the statement draws the conclusion that_________. To substantiate (support) this conclusion, the arguer points out the evidence that____ , In addition, he indicate that____. Furthermore, he quotes (cites) the result of a recent survey, in support of this recommendation. At the first glance (sight ) this argument appears to somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that_______. It omits some substantial concerns that should be addressed in the argument. From the logical perspective, this argument suffers from N logical flaws.五.如何写正文段(4-6中招特征:rebuttal的sequence 排序法)1.顺序式攻击(大部分分题目可以用,但当原题逻辑顺序自相矛盾不可以用)2.主次式攻击3.让步式攻击(最好的攻击逻辑) A不成立B不成立 即便A成立B还是不成立 更何况AC都不成立时,C比不成立即便AC都成立B也不成立六.正文段首(主次式排列引言句) 3段式,最后为过渡段1.The threshold problem with A is that 2.anthother problem that weaken the logic of this argument is that_____3.Before I come to my conclusion, it is necessary to point out the last flaw involved in this argument that____七.如何写结尾段(总结陈词) 逻辑结构+ Conclusion中的flaws + Solution(suggestion)再一次用简洁的语言:指出问题 分析问题 解决问题八.结尾段 To sum up, this arguer fails to substantiate his claim that___, because the evidence cited in the analyses does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintain. To make the argument more convincing, the authors would have to provid more information with respect (regard to) of S1. Additionally, he would have to demonstrate that S2. Therefore, if the rgument had include that given factors discussed above, it would have been more thorough and logically acceptable.九.各个逻辑错误(详见讲义)(一)调查类错误⑴调查过程错误1.错误原理:2Q+2非主流错因A. Quality:调查样本不随机,以偏代全(调查对象有几层修饰,几层片面)B. Quantity:数量是否符合调查对象特征,基数和百分比值只出现一个C.被访者是

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

中华书局 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档