６级考前最新命制试卷二参考答案及录音文本.docVIP

６级考前最新命制试卷二 参考答案及录音文本 参考答案 Part I Writing 【参考范文一】 Should Foreign Abbreviations Be Banned on TV? Recently, CCTV banned the use of borrowed English abbreviations such as NBA, WTO and CPI in all its programs. Some people applaud the move, maintaining that it helps preserve the purity of the Chinese language. The media is deeply engaged in the ongoing Westernization of Chinese language. If the phenomenon is not stopped, Chinese will be gradually reduced from an independent expression system to a mixture of languages. Others, however, shake their heads. It is not persuasive, they say, that the media shy away from foreign abbreviations to preserve the purity of the Chinese language and culture. After all, languages’ integration is a very complicated process and it’s irrational to impose a simple ban on certain words. Besides, the use of foreign abbreviations won’t shake the status of Chinese as an embodiment of and the basis of the 5,000-year-old Chinese culture. As far as I am concerned, there is no need to ban the use of foreign abbreviations on TV. A language is great, not because of its purity, but because of its tolerance to other languages. Chinese is so rich and beautiful because it constantly absorbs words, abbreviations and phrases from other languages. It’s totally unnecessary to fear about the disappearance of Chinese if we allow English to mix with Chinese. 【参考范文二】 Should Foreign Abbreviations Be Banned on TV? That some TV stations banned the use of foreign abbreviations in their programs sparked off a heated debate. Those who support the ban maintain that the borrowed words make it difficult for some people to understand. It is true that people often read and hear foreign abbreviations like NBA, CBA, GDP, WTO and CPI in an era of the explosion of information. But how many people can explain accurately what these expressions stand for? To those who oppose the ban, it makes no sense for TV stations to exempt their audiences from foreign expressions. Popular fo