[欧盟口译训练A2，英语].Euit-en-10091904.pdfVIP

1 策马翻译培训 Euit EU interpretation training 欧盟口译训练 Copyright © 2010 CEMACHINA.COM, All Rights Reserved EU interpretation training | A zh-en 2 策马翻译培训 如何保住全球化成果？ HOW TO PRESERVE THE OPEN ECONOMY AT A TIME OF STRESS Is the spread of prosperity in the 对于今天高收入国家的国民而言，繁荣 interests of citizens of todays 的传播是否符合他们的利益？这些国家经 high-income countries? Is globalisation 济的全球化是否符合他们的利益呢？ of their economies in their interest? These distinct questions are raised 劳伦斯•萨默斯 (Lawrence Summers)为 in my mind by two important columns from 英国《金融时报》撰写的两篇重要专栏文章 Lawrence Summers ( America needs to make （4 月27 日的《美国需要重新解释贸易的原 a new case for trade on April 27 and A 因》(America needs to make a new case for strategy to promote healthy trade)及《如何推动健康的全球化》(A globalisation on May 4). In these, Mr strategy to promote healthy Summers argues that the international globalisation)），让我脑海中浮现了这两 economic policies of the US need to be 个独特的问题。萨默斯在文中主张，美国的 coupled more closely to the interests of 国际经济政策需要更紧密地与本国工人的利 its workers. Many Europeans will concur. 益联系起来。很多欧洲人会表示赞同。 This is not to argue that the 这并不是说，高收入国家国民的利益比 interests of citizens of high-income 其他人的利益更为重要。相反，穷人收入增 countries are more important than those 长抵消了富人收入相应损失的观点，从道义 of others. On the contrary, the view that 上讲颇为发人深思。但政治植根于国家层面。 increases in incomes of the poor offset 除非（或直到）世界上出现一个全球政治共 equivalent losses for the rich is morally 同体，否则政治将只会对国家利益的感知做 compelling. But politics is national. 出反应。 Unless or until a global political community emerges, politics will respond EU interpretation training | A