- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
本科毕业论文(设计)
外 文 翻 译
外文出处 Journal of European Industrial Training. Volume. 27.2003(09) .P473 – 480
外文作者 David Robotham
原文:
Learning and training: developing the competent learner
Improving learning during training
The improvement of learning in the context of training is an objective which often appears to be of secondary importance. Indeed one could reasonably argue that learning itself appears to warrant little interest in the majority of training programmes. This view is supported by Antonacopoulou (1999) who, from an extensive review of the review of the management development literature, concluded that:
A central priority of management development is the improvement of organisational competitiveness, productivity, and ultimately efficiency. These definitions often neglect that an integral part of the development process is learning. Even when reference is made to learning there is hardly any indication that there is flexibility and that individual differences in learning styles are taken into account (Antonacopoulou, 1999, p. 16).
This lack of focus on the importance of learning may be due in part to the attitudes of employees, who regard training as simply a means for improving job prospects (Rigg, 1989). The organisation may also mitigate against learning being seen as important during training through a failure to provide an appropriate infrastructure to support learning after training has taken place (Antonacopoulou, 2001). It is also due in part to the historical distinction that is made between education, training, development and learning. They are typically presented as being separate activities. This distinction is in some ways artificial and not one that sits well with contemporary thinking about learning. It is perhaps more appropriate to adopt the view put forward by Garavan (1997, p. 47) who argues that:
Increasing an individual’s capacity to learn and their involvement in the process
文档评论(0)