卫生专业技术职务评聘指标及机制研究.pdfVIP

实  践  与  交  流 2010, 10(5): 631 633 中国循证医学杂志 ～ 卫生专业技术职务评聘指标及机制研究 1 2,* 罗  琳  梁  旭 1. 四川大学华西医院人力资源部（成都 610041 ）；2. 四川大学人事处（成都 610065 ） 摘要  目的 探讨卫生专业技术职务评聘的指标及机制。方法 收集华西医院获得高级职称员工的资料及历 年高级职称评审文件，总结分析卫生专业技术职务评聘的主要指标及机制现状。结果 2003 ～2009 年四川大学华 西医院共有 400 名员工获得高级职称。评价指标包括学历、著作、科研项目、专利申报及获奖情况 5 个方面。有 80% 的高级职称获得者在取得高级卫生专业技术职务评聘后论文发表及科研业绩均有下降。结论 当前评聘指标存在 重硬件轻软件、重视科研忽视临床和教学工作的问题；评聘机制存在只上不下，缺乏后效评价的问题。今后针对卫 生专业技术职务评聘的特点，应进一步完善评价指标和聘用机制。 关键词 卫生专业技术职务；评聘指标；评聘机制 Evaluation Index and Appointment Mechanism of Healthy Professional Titles 1 2,* LUO Lin , LIANG Xu 1. Department of Human Resources Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Department of Personnel, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China Abstract Objective To explore the evaluation index and appointment mechanism of healthy professional titles. Methods We collected the data of people evaluated and appointed as advanced professional titles, and the evaluation and appointment documents in West China Hospital. We analyzed the evaluation index and appointment mechanism. Results A total of 400 people gained senior title promotion. The evaluation indexes focused on academic degrees, papers, research projects, patents, as well as awards and honors. The research achievements reduced of 80% people who had gained senior titles. Conclusion Current evaluation indexes prefer to inflexible index and ignore flexible index. The appointment mechanism lacks outcome evaluation, and the professional title will not be eliminated once appointed. In the future, we should improve the evaluation index and appointment mechanism focusing on the specific characteristics of healthy professional titles. Key words Healthy professional title; Evaluation index; Appointment mechanism