Land and Natural Resource Redistribution in Zimbabwe Access, Equity and Conflict.外文翻译.docVIP
- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
毕业论文(设计)文献翻译
Land and Natural Resource Redistribution in Zimbabwe: Access, Equity and Conflict.
The struggle for land redistribution in Zimbabwe raises a number of critical policy questions, and lessons for the southern Africa region. Twenty years after independence following armed liberation struggle, the structural roots of Zimbabwe’s current political conflict and economic crisis remain largely defined by racially based inequalities in land ownership and access, to related resources. In this context the Government of Zimbabwe (GoZ) together with land owners and the international community ‘have been seeking’ a framework for land negotiations since 1980s, however the market route chosen for land transfer was ineffective and failed to deliver adequate land for resettlement.
One of the unique features of Zimbabwe’s land reform crisis is that its decolonization in 1980 was not accompanied by guaranteed arrangements for the former colonial powers to restore lost land rights or to compensate for the same. While, the United Kingdom (UK) in 1997 at Lancaster House promised £75 million for Zimbabwe’s land redistribution alongside apparent United States of America (USA) offers of US$ 500 million for the same, there was no formally binding procedure which underlay this. Reparations were not directly discussed. Instead a vague “development assistance” framework was used to prescribe such support, in spite of the fact that the “Kissinger US$ 1 billion” for Zimbabwe mooted in 1976 as the basis for a political settlement which accommodated white settlers in an independent Zimbabwe. By 2000, Zimbabwe had received £30 million. In contrast the Kenyan decolonization process came with over £100 million provided in loans and grants for land acquisition and resettlement. Indeed Zimbabwe’s decolonization required the post-independence government to compensate land at market prices and to pay retired pensioners in foreign currency. Thus colonial obligations for land restoration
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2025年最新部编版三年级语文上册全册教案(表格式) .pdf VIP
- 2024年3月17日广西区直遴选笔试真题及解析.docx VIP
- 2025辽宁机电职业技术学院单招数学常考点试卷及参考答案详解(典型题).docx VIP
- 2025年新人教版语文2年级上册全册教学课件.pptx
- 重大危险源辨识(GB18218-2000).pdf VIP
- 现代汉语语法研究—陆俭明.pptx VIP
- 国家制度和社会治理 试题(25+4)(含解析).docx VIP
- 2025年西师版数学六年级上册全册练习题及参考答案 .pdf VIP
- 2024年企业首席质量官技能竞赛理论试题库资料-下(多选、判断题汇总).pdf VIP
- Unit 2 Transportation Listening and Speaking 课件 中职英语高教版基础模块1(2023修订版).pptx
文档评论(0)