- 1、本文档共52页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
优秀博硕毕业论文,完美PDF内部资料。支持编辑复制,值得参考!!!
II
Abstract
Threatening is a common speech act in people’s daily lives. By using some
methods of discourse analysis, this thesis intends to make an all-round analysis from
the point of view of Pragmatics.
The result reveals that: there are three general sequential patterns of threatening
in Chinese context: single threatening sentence, single adjacency pair and
multi-adjacency pair. Of the multi-adjacency pair, there are pre-threatening, core
sequence, insertion sequences and response sequences. According to the character of
the process, there are four forms: threat—solve—eliminate,
threat—question—solve—superaddition, threat—escape—superaddition and
threat—refute. And an analysis is focused on the strategies of core, assistance and
response.
At last, an investigation is carried out into the realization of threatening. The result
partially proves that power, social distance etc. play an important role in the choice of
threatening strategies.
Keyword: threatening; discourse patterns; strategy types; pragmatic tendency
文档评论(0)