尾随取财行为刑法分析--以张某抢劫案为例.docVIP

 内容摘要 本文以张某尾随取财一案为研究材料，以对尾随、取财行为的定性为基本主 线，并对犯罪既遂后的其他行为如何进行刑法评价为辅助，通过对法理的分析和 实践的探寻去得出结论。 本文的主体结构包括以下四个部分： 第一部分主要是介绍要讨论的基本案情，并明确案件的争议焦点，即对张某 尾随行为，捡包取财行为以及后续的威胁、殴打行为的认定。 第二部分则结合法理分析和实践中的做法，对上述争议焦点逐个进行分析并 在此基础上归纳，对尾随行为在本案中是否能够作为实行行为、其捡包取财行为 是盗窃还是抢夺、后续殴打、威胁行为应当单独抑或综合评价三个问题进行探讨， 并得出结论。 第三部分是对本案的研究结论。通过对本案中争议焦点的分析得出对张某行 为的刑事认定，即尾随行为依旧应当是犯罪预备行为而非实行行为，取财行为则 当被认定为抢夺而非盗窃，再综合张某后续行为的实际意图，认为张某的行为应 当构成转化型抢劫罪。 第四部分是通过本案所得出的一些启示。在对张某一系列行为理论分析的基 础上，我国刑法的进步过程应当是循序渐进的，并应切合司法现状和社会公共认 识。 关键词: 尾随;盗窃罪；抢夺罪；抢劫罪 1 Abstract Taking the case that Mr Zhang gets property with trailing after someone as research materials, the paper mainly studies definitions on “trailing behavior” as well as “taking property secretly”. Also, this paper makes legal analysis and explores the judicial practice, coming to a conclusion .The main structure of this article consists of the following three parts: The first part is mainly to introduce basic facts of the case and propose the dispute focal points, which means that how to define Mr Zhang’s trailing after someone, taking property secretly as well as subsequent threats and beatings. The second part is to analyze the dispute focal points one by one and have a summary in accordance with legal analysis and judicial practice. Further more, three problems are further explored. Whether the trailing behavior in the case should be regarded as the committing action or not ? Is taking property secretly with following after someone considered as theft or plunder? Should the subsequent actions such as threats and beatings be separately or comprehensive evaluated? Finally, this part draws a conclusion to these questions. The third part is reaching a conclusion and giving some revelations to the case. According to analyzing the dispute focal points of the case, this paper arrives at a conclusion that Mr Zhang should be convicted of robbery. Mr Zhang trails after someone, which should be defined as “preparation actions”, instead of “committing actions”. He takes property secr