- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
总 结 LDL-C,HDL-C和TG都与心血管风险显著相关。 2型糖尿病患者混合型血脂异常与心血管风险显著相关。 2型糖尿病患者混合型血脂异常干预的终点研究显示:他汀的证据是最充分的,尤其是辛伐他汀20-40mg。同时他汀与非诺贝特或烟酸的联用是安全的。 谢谢! * 谈到血脂异常, 目前临床研究证据往往是更多关于LDL-C. 对于混合型血脂异常(LDL颗粒小而密, 低HDL-C, 高TG), 还没有很多研究来关注. 而糖尿病患者的血脂异常往往是混合型血脂异常. 对于这些患者血脂干预的证据又是如何呢? * 弗明汉研究显示, 低HDL-C的冠心病风险显著上升. The Framingham Heart Study was one of the first epidemiologic studies to demonstrate the association between increased CHD risk and suboptimal HDL-C levels.1 This landmark trial examined HDL-C and LDL-C levels in relation to CHD risk in a large cohort of men 50 to 70 years of age.2 This slide shows that the relative risk of CHD events increased markedly with decreasing HDL-C concentration at every level of LDL-C concentration.2 Conversely, as LDL-C increased, the most dramatic increases in CHD risk were evident within the lowest HDL-C categories: 0.6 mmol/L (25 mg/dL) and 1.2 mmol/L (45 mg/dL).2 References Castelli WP. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease: The Framingham study. Am J Med. 1984;76:4–12. Kannel WB. Status of risk factors and their consideration in antihypertensive therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:80A–90A. * * 一项包括29项前瞻性研究, 共262525例患者的荟萃分析提示, 将患者基线TG进行3等分, 然后观察1/3高TG患者与1/3低TG患者的冠心病风险. 结果发现, 高TG患者的冠心病风险显著高于低TG患者. 而TG对冠心病风险的影响不受随访时间, 性别, 是否空腹因素影响. 尽管HDL调整与否会影响这种相关性的强弱, 但还是显著相关. The association between TG values and CHD risk was also evaluated in a recent meta-analysis by Sarwar et al. Twenty-nine prospective studies were included, representing the largest and most comprehensive epidemiologic assessment in Western populations (262,525 participants; 10,158 CHD cases). The combined analysis of the 29 studies yielded an adjusted odds ratio of 1.72 (95% CI, 1.56–1.90) in a comparison of extreme thirds of usual TG values (ie, individuals with usual log-TG values in the top third of the population compared with those in the bottom third). This odds ratio was adjusted in all but one study for at least age, sex, smoking status, lipid concentrations, and most studies also adjus
文档评论(0)