- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
影响急诊科心肺复苏成功率的因素.doc
影响急诊科心肺复苏成功率的因素
隋向前邓旻周燕华朱仕兵徐颖 马伟 吕菁【摘要】 目的 分析影响急诊科心肺复苏成功率的因素,探讨提高急诊抢救效率的方法。方法 分析2004年至2006年间142例心肺复苏病例。2004、2005年病例2000AHA 心肺复苏指南抢救;2006年病例按2005AHA 心肺复苏指南抢救。病例被分为成功组(42例)和失败组(100例)。用t检验、χ2 检验、Logistic回归分析复苏过程中35项因素对复苏结果的影响。结果 失败组外伤病例比例高,2种或以上疾病史少,有先兆病例比例低,冬春季节发病比例低,非递增法用肾上腺素比例低,用肾上腺素总量大,胺碘酮及纳络酮的使用率低。两组比较有显著性差异(P0.05); Logistic回归分析显示肾上腺素总量是复苏失败的独立危险因子;用纳络酮是复苏失败的独立保护因子。结论 掌握先兆、小量用肾上腺素、用胺碘酮、用纳络酮是提高心肺复苏成功率的有利因素。【关键词】心肺复苏;心脏按压
Factors on successful emergency cardiopulmonary resuscitation in emergency department DENG Min , SUI Xiangqian , ZHOU Yanhua, et al . Emergency Department, raditional Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou310003, China
【Abstract】Objective To analyze the factors on successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in emergency department and to study the methods of raising the efficiency of the emergency salvage. Methods 142 cases of CPR between January 2004~December 2006 were analyzed . The cases in 2004 and 2005 were treated according to 2000 American Heart Association guidelines for CPR ,and the cases in 2006 were treated according to 2005American Heart Association guidelines for CPR. The cases were divided into the success group (42 cases) and the failure group(100cases).The effect of 35 factors on the result of CPR were analyzed by t test , χ2 test and Logistic regression. Result There were higher rate of external trauma, lower rate of history more than one disease , lower rate of omen, lower rate of getting sick in the winter and the spring , lower rate of using 1 mg of adrenaline each time, using greater quantities of adrenaline , lower rate of using amiodarone , lower rate of using naloxane in the failure group. There were obvious differences between the two groups (P0.05). Logistic regression showed that total amount of adrenaline was the independent risk of the failure of CPR(OR=1.2994) and using naloxane was the independent benefit of the failure of CPR (OR=0.2894). Conclusion To control omen, to use small quantity of
文档评论(0)