阵型-位置选择.docVIP

Comparison of the Semi-Finalists 进入半决赛球队之间的比较 Three of the four semi-finalists played with an almost identical system (Italy, France and Portugal), though there were some differences among the many similarities. The defences comprised two excellent centre-backs and two fast, tactically adept full-backs and were very effective. In midfield these teams had a strong-tackling ball-winner (Gattuso, 8, ITA , Makelele, 6, FRA and Costinha, 6, POR) and a linkman between the midfield and attack (Pirlo, 21, ITA , Vieira, 4, FRA and Maniche, 18, POR). Germany’s back four was equally as stable. Frings (8) played the defensive role in midfield and Ballack (13) also supported the attack. 进入半决赛的四支球队中有三支球队使用了相同的阵形，4-5-1阵形（分别是意大利队、法国队和葡萄牙队），当然他们在诸多的相同之处中也有一些不同的地方。后防线上都有两名优秀的中后卫和两名速度快、战术素养高的边后卫，这三个队的后防都相当的稳固。在中场这些队都各有一名抢截能力强的队员（意大利队8号加图索，法国队6号马克莱莱以及葡萄牙队6号科斯蒂尼亚），另外各队还各有一名支持中前场进攻的前卫（意大利队21号皮尔洛、法国队4号维埃拉和葡萄牙队18号马尼切）。德国队的后防同样稳固，另外，在中场方面，弗林斯（8号）担任防守型中场，而巴拉克则担任攻击型中场。 On the flanks France and Portugal went with attacking wingers, whereas Italy nominated two hard-working midfielders. Germany had a player with good dribbling ability on the left and an accomplished technician on the right, with the latter frequently moving inside to provide a link between defence and attack. I n contrast, the other three semi-finalists assigned the attacking role to a central midfielder. Zidane (10, FRA) and Deco (20, POR) were creative sources, dictating the play and looking to score themselves, while Totti (10, ITA ) was more of a second striker. The forwards also showed different traits. With his pace and dribbling ability, Henry (12, FRA) was able to get past two or more defenders. Toni (9, ITA ) also made frequent attempts to go it alone, whereas Pauleta (9, POR) relied on support from the flanks. T he German strikers complemented each other well. Even when long balls were played from the back they were able to combine to threaten the opposition goal. 法国队和葡萄牙队的两翼均配备了两名攻击型的边前卫，而意大利队则在两翼安排了两名跑动非常积极的球员。德国队的左