- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
翻译研究方法ResearchProposal.ppt
11. Assessing Your Research Evaluation is a crucial part of the research process. Giving and receiving critical feedback is an essential part of life in an academic community. 11.1 Self-assessment Here is a checklist of the kinds of purely methodological issues you might want to assess in your own work: Research question / aim Is it clearly stated? Have you explained why this is a good question / an important or interesting aim? Other relevant research How well did you relate what you are doing to what others have done? Have you consulted the most relevant sources? Hypothesis Are you starting or concluding with a specific hypothesis? Did you make this clear? What kind of hypothesis is it? Why is it interesting / important? Is it well justified? Material Have you presented your empirical material clearly? Have you explained why you chose it? How relevant is it to your research question? Have you explained how you collected it? How representative is it? Relation between variables What kind of relation are you looking for? Do you think you have found any relation? Between what variables is the relation you have found? Is this clear to the reader? Theoretical model Have you explained why you chose a particular theoretical model or approach / a particular variant of that model? What about other possibilities? Did you explain why you rejected those? Have you adapted the model at all? Why? General concepts and categories Are they adequately defined? Are they justified against alternative concepts, categories and definitions? What kind of categories? What kind of classification? Have you been explicit enough in presenting these? Counter-evidence Have you considered any counter-evidence? Have you dealt with borderline cases adequately? Are there any counter-arguments? Are there any alternative explanations? Reliability Is the analysis reliable? Is it explicit enough to be replicable? Are the calculations accurate
文档评论(0)