2008,_Building_on_a_Landfill,_Santa_Barbara课件.pptVIP

2008,_Building_on_a_Landfill,_Santa_Barbara课件.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
6,000SF metal building Intended for storage of County records No occupancy- talk about use Adjacent to an existing metal storage building- precedent, performing adequately, settling Located at the Calle Real Maintenance Campus, atop the abandoned “Foothill Landfill” closed in 1967 * Begs the question “why? * Campus master plan Future buildings: EOC, sheriff’s tech services, evidence storage building, vets addition/reno History, part of a proposed elections building, wasn’t approved by the BOS What do you do with storage? * Existing development, existing infrastructure, Smart growth principles Buildable and occupiable CEQA categorical exemption, under 10,000SF * Proceeded with siting a 6,000 metal, wrinkled tin, butler building at the top of the hill. Area off of Calle Real, abandoned car lot, transfer station. Soil borings revealed miles of trash, geotech report said “find a better site, I have nothing to base a design on.” Follow-up report said either deep caissons, or a mat foundation/waffle foundation, we all agreed to go that route since unoccupied building. Hired a metal building specialist, Dave Burke. He is also a GC and assisted us with phase I of the project which made repairs to the existing building. On our merry way when things got interesting. * This is where the fun began * We thought we were over our CEQA hurdle falling within a categorical exemption, county architect said “looks good, just add something about how you’re going to mitigate the methane”. What? “yeah, you have to comply with environmental regs for building on the landfill” Even though no one will live in the building? Yes, unless they grant you an exemption. Went back to the architect, well I have dealt with this, and it will cost you both in methane venting and an environmental consultant. Yikes. Began discussions with PW Resource Recovery who operate the transfer station, and whose jurisdiction the landfill falls under. “By the way, we have neighbor issues” Put it all in the hoppe

文档评论(0)

精品文库 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档