UK Warship Procurement Strategies ndash; Accident or Design.ppt

UK Warship Procurement Strategies ndash; Accident or Design.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
UKWarshipProcurementStrategiesamp;ndash;AccidentorDesign.ppt

UK Warship Procurement Strategies – Accident or Design? Stuart Young Deputy Director – Centre for Defence Acquisition +44 (0) 1793 785051 syoung.cu@da.mod.uk Agenda Background – Development of Naval Shipbuilding in the UK since the 2nd World War The Defence Industrial Strategy Case Studies Offshore Patrol Vessel Type 45 Destroyer CVF – Future Aircraft Carrier Conclusions Background – UK Warship Building since WW2 Focus on commercial ships immediately after WW2 – sellers market. Early 50s – first new ships since WW2. New technologies led to increased cost and delays. Development of competitors from shipyards in Europe and Far East – problems in UK shipbuilding exposed. Admiralty returned to competitive tendering – by 1965 ten shipyards closed or merged/ Proposal to reduce to 3 specialist naval shipbuilders. 1973 Oil Crisis – Ship building collapsed. UK Government nationalised the industry. Background – UK Warship Building since WW2 1986 – Industry de-nationalised. Six yards designated as warship builders Competition and reduced number of orders led to further rationalisation – 3 yards, 2 companies 2005 - Defence Industrial Strategy. Establishment of BVT Surface Fleet joint venture 2009 - Signing of long agreement with MoD – cost savings (£350M) in exchange for guaranteed minimum workload (£235M/year) Buyout of VT by BAE Systems – now 3 yards, 1 company Defence Procurement Initiatives – 1998-2009 Defence Industrial Strategy - Aims Giving a strategic view of defence capability requirements going forward, by sector, and specifying which industrial capabilities the government wished to see retained in the UK for Defence reasons to meet these requirements. Providing details on the principles and processes that underpin procurement and industrial decisions. Investigating how the mismatch, or gap, between the MoD’s plans and the level required to sustain desired industrial capabilities onshore might be addressed. DIS – Maritime Sector – Key Points Need only to retain a

文档评论(0)

shengyp + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档