论罪行法定原则的价值取向问题.docVIP

目　录 中文摘要及关键词…………………………………………………………… 一、罪行法定原则的源起与演进以及其价值观冲突……………………………1 二、大多数学者关于罪刑法定原则的价值冲突及取向的主要观点……………3 三、关于罪刑法定原则的价值冲突及取向的进一步论述………………………4 四、罪刑法定在我国的确立及其应有的司法运作………………………………8 五、结语……………………………………………………………………………9 参考文献……………………………………………………………………………10 摘　要 罪刑法定原则既是一个老话题，也是一个新话题。大家通常把其理解为“法无明文规定不为罪、法无明文规定不处罚”。此种表述尽管从很大程度上揭示了罪刑法定原则的核心内容，但随着罪刑法定不断发展完善，这种表述越来越容易使人只能得罪刑法定的形，而不得罪刑法定的神。罪刑法定的产生是人们在封建罪刑擅断和专制极度盛行和极度压迫下渴望人权自由的迫切需要，其价值蕴含是人权、自由。然而，随着经济的发展以及我们成文法所拥有的局限性，罪刑法定只追求人权保障得价值取向已不再适应社会的需要。逐渐发展起来的且适应当前社会需要的社会本位价值与人权保障价值就有了一定的冲突和对立面。但是，我们只要社会保护价值而完全抛弃人权保障，那么，国家刑罚权又无限制，可能重蹈覆辙的走向罪刑擅断。可是我们既不能摒弃人权保障又不能完全注重社会保护价值，我们该如何认识它们之间的冲突以及寻求适应社会需要的价值取向？本文所要力求解决的正是这一点。 关键词：罪刑法定　人权保障　社会保护　个人本位　社会本位　罪刑擅断 ecides the principle not only is an old topic, also is a new topic. Everybody usually understanding it in this way:the law does not have its understanding the regulations for the crime, the law does not have the regulations not to punish. Although this kind of indication from promulgated the crime criminal law to decide the principle to a great extent the core content, But decides along with the crime criminal law develops the consummation unceasingly, This kind of indication is more and more easy to enable the human only to offend the criminal law to decide the shape, but does not offend the criminal law to decide the charm. The crime criminal law decides the production is the people makes an arbitrary decision despotically with in the feudal crime punishment is in vogue extremely with the extreme oppression under longs for the human rights free urgent need, Its value implication is the human rights, the freedom. However, the limitation which has along with the economical development as well as our written law, the crime criminal law decides only pursues the human rights safeguard to result in the value orientation no longer to meet societys need. Gradually developed the social standard value and the human rights safeguard value which also the adaptation current society needed had certain co