解析版—武汉市2016高考英语一轮完形填空和阅读理解选练12及答案.docVIP

解析版—武汉市2016高考英语一轮完形填空和阅读理解选练12及答案.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
完形填空。阅读下面短文,掌握其大意,然后从各题所给的四个选项A、B、C和D中,选出最佳答案。 In an effort to raise awareness about the homeless,those living on the streets are being recruited(招募) to read the weather forecast 1.________ TV in Europe. Saatchi Saatchi Berlin set up the program,called Days of Hope, in 2.________ homeless people deliver the weather forecast and discuss 3.________ it affects them while living on the streets. “This is 4.________ very simple but surprising idea,which 5.________ are expecting to get a lot of attention,encourage conversations around this important issue,and 6.________ important of all,increase donations,” John Pallant,Saatchi Saatchis regional creative director for EMEA,said. Russia and Romania have already taken part in the program,7.________ Germany,Switzerland and Poland are expected 8.________ follow.And Days of Hope originated on the radio in Germany. (五) 1. on 考查介词。on TV “在电视上”,为固定搭配。 2. which 考查定语从句的引导词。此处in which引导定语从句修饰the program。 3. how 考查宾语从句的引导词。萨奇柏林广告公司做了一档名叫Days of Hope的节目,节目请来了流浪汉来播报天气,并讨论这种天气对于他们这种露宿街头的人来说会有怎样的影响。 4. a 考查冠词。此空表泛指,故用a。此处意为“这是一个非常简单却让人惊讶的想法”。 5. we 考查代词。该空在句中作主语,再结合句意可判断填we。 6. most 考查副词。我们希望能够通过这种想法得到更多人的关注,并引发大家对这个重要的问题的讨论。最重要的是希望此举能够增加人们对流浪汉的捐助。 7. while 考查并列连词。while在此处连接两个并列句子,意为“而”。句意:俄罗斯、罗马尼亚已经参与到这个节目中来了,而德国、瑞士、波兰都有可能加入。 8. to 考查不定式符号。be expected to do sth被期待做某事。 阅读理解。 Which is safer --- staying at home, traveling to work on public transport, or working at the office? Surprisingly, each of these carries the same risk, which is very low. However, what about flying compared to working in the chemical industry? Unfortunately, the former is 65 times riskier than the latter! In fact the accident rate of workers in the chemical industry is less than that of almost any of human activity, and almost as safe as staying at home. The trouble with the chemical industry is that when things go wrong they often cause death to those living nearby. It is this that chemical accidents so newsworthy. Fortunately, they are extremely rare. The m

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

搬运工 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档