再论毛泽三个世界划分理论的形成及其意义.pdfVIP

摘 要 近年来，理论界对于毛泽东三个世界划分的理论褒贬不一，评价截然对立， 到底如何看待？本文把否定这一理论的理由归纳为四个问题：第一、三个世界划 分的理论立论没有依据，不成其为理论。第二、三个世界划分的理论没有经过深 思熟虑。第三、三个世界划分的理论对具体国家的从属划分没有道理，理论表述 失当。第四、三个世界划分的理论在实践中带来很多问题，20世纪 70年代末已 经过时。 为更好地判断，本文从三个世界划分理论的内涵着眼，通过对三个世界划分 理论的形成及其发展过程的历史考察，可知三个世界划分的理论有着客观的立论 依据；而且从抗日战争时期开始，酝酿、萌芽、初成、形成与发展，有着清晰明 了的脉络，其形成经历了长时间的理性思考，并非灵机一动。同样，经过对该理 论形成发展过程的详细考察，从各个阶段发展变化的内在联系分析，可以印证这 一理论具有丰富的内涵，对具体国家的从属划分亦有道理，理论的表述很严谨。 在总结三个世界划分理论的实践意义、方法论意义的基础上，结合分析三个世界 划分理论与“一条线”战略的关系、新时期外交政策转变的原因，我们还可以得 知这一理论很好地指导了实践，且并没有过时。 三个世界划分的理论是毛泽东晚年关于国际战略策略的正确思想，属于毛泽 东思想。在新的历史时期我们要历史地、全面地、发展地看待这一理论，与时俱 进地继承和发扬这一理论的精髓。 关键词：毛泽东；三个世界划分的理论；形成；意义；发展 I Abstract In recent years, theorists had different opinions regarding the Mao Zedong’s theory of the three worlds’division, but how to treat the opposed evaluation? The author of this thesis summarized the four reasons of denying this theory: firstly, the theory of the three worlds’division was not based on the theoretical arguments and cannot become a theory; second ly, this theory had not been considered seriously; thirdly, this theory was not suitable to the specific country; fourthly, the theory brought many problems in practice in the 20th century, and had already outdated in the late 1970s. In order to have a thorough judgment, the paper focuses on the connotation of the theory of the three worlds’division, and concludes that the theory is based on objective arguments through the inspection of the formation and historical development of the theory. And from the war of resistance against Japanese, the formation of this theory had experienced a long-time of rational thinking. Moreover, we can prove th