Economic Law and Commercial Law.docVIP

英语班级：1B2 专业： 法学081 成员： 罗维鹏 学号：08221040123 成员： 吴 昊 学号： Economic Law and Commercial Law The Frist application of Hong Kong Law by a Mainland Count On June 11，Zhongshan Intermediate People’s Count of Guangdong privince made the frist instance judgment on a Hongkong-related lease dispute. The case is said to be the frist one where the Hongkong law is applied by a mianland count. Plaintiff Diamond Lease Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Diamond”) and one defendant Ronghui Technology Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Ronghui”) are both Hongkong based companies. The count ordered the lease contract between the parties to terminated，and the lessee Ronghui to return rental equipment. The dispute is reportedly due to defendant Ronghui violation of the lease agreement. Plaintiff Diamond claimed that，on November 22， 2002，it entered into a lease contract with Ronghui leased certain machine equipment from Diamond. Diamond delivered the equipment to Ronghui for use under the agreement，although the actual user was Ronghui Electronics(Zhongshan) Ltd. (hereafter referred to as “Ronghui”). However，Ronghui did not fulfill the rental payment requirements set out in the contract，and failed to pay any rental since September 2003. Diamond alleged Ltd Ronghui’contractual violation，and requested the count to order the contract dissolution and the return of rental equipment from two defendants. “This contract shall be governed by，and interpreted and construed in accordance with the Law of Hongkong. The Lesseor and Lessee consent to the jurisdiction of courts in Hongkong， and the Lesseor may turn to counts in any other competent jurisdiction for compulsory enforcement of this contract.擳he contracting parties agreed upon the application of law for dispute resolution under Article 16 of the Lease Contract. Since Diamond and Ronghui concurred the Law of Hongkong as the governing law, Zhongshan Intermediate Count ordered Diamond to proof concerning the