静库容计算方法的比较分析.pdfVIP

# 1# 地矿测绘 2007, 23( 2): 1~ 4 CN 53- 1124/TD ISSN 1007- 9394 Surveying and apping ofGeology and ineralResources * 米鸿燕, 宰 建, 蒋兴华 (昆明理工大学 国土资源工程学院, 云南 昆明 650093) : ( DE ) 4, ,, 4 , 4, (DE ) : ; DE ;;; ;; : P 22611 : A : 1007- 9394( 2007) 02- 0001- 04 Contrast andAnalysis ofReservoir StorageCalculationMethods IHong-yan, ZA IJian, JIANG X ing-hua (Faculty of Land ResourceEng ineering, K unm ing University of Science and Technology, K unm ing Yunnan 650093, China) Abstract: There areDE , grid, transect, and contours fourmethods for reservoir storage calculation in civil eng-i neering. On account of the diversity and complexity of underwater topography, different calculation methods adopted in the samewaters have somedifferences in thepracticalengineering applications. Therefore, it isvitaltowhich calculation method can beutilized, which mathmodel should be adopted, andwhat the accuracy of reservoir storage calculation is. This articlew ill dealw ith the contrast and analysis in advantages and disadvantages ofmath model and its applications, butDE has the superiority in the fourmethods, based on thebasicprinciple of above fourmethods. Combiningw ith the practical example, the article elsew illdiscuss their application range, condition and precision theoretically. Key words: reservoir storage calculation; DE ( digital elevation model) method; grid method; transectmethod; contourmethod; contrast; analysis , 0 , , 1 , , ,