GREargument课堂笔记.docxVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
GREargument课堂笔记.docx

Revised GRE Analytical Writing 考试形式 .Analysis of an argument, 30 minutes .Analysis of an issue, 30 minutes 题库 ./gre /revised_general/prepare/analytical_writing/issue/pool Analysis of an argument preparing strategies 1, 熟读题目 2, 闪光句型 3, Critical thinking 4, 形成各类问题自己的分析思路(模板) 5, 列每道题提纲 6, 全文练习10-20篇 Argument writing steps 1, 审题(画逻辑链) 2, 分析评价每个环节 3, 确定要写的环节(提纲) 4, 结合模板展开 审题:分清论据和结论,看清推理关系 结论的标志词:Therefore, thus, hence 以及: Clearly, should/must, 目的状语 Evidence: Facts /Statistics /Examples Ways of argumentation: Comparison /Analogy Assumptions 写作原则 逻辑:切中要害 语言:言简意赅 词汇:正规书面语言 句式:变化,适度复杂 初期读题需注意 论据结论各自的讨论对象 限定成分 绝对化词汇: all, any, every, only, most, best How to write the introduction Basic elements Concession (Cc) Description (D) Conclusion (cl) Evidence/Assumption (ev) Feature (f) Evaluation (El) Suggestion (S) 万用动词:claim, assert, allege, state, contend, maintain 建议:suggest, advise, advocate, recommend, propose 预言:predict, forecast/foresee, project 期待,盼望:expect, anticipate In this argument, the arguer cites the evidence that … to reach the conclusion that … By citing the evidence that … , the arguer concludes that … fallacies in topics 题目中常见缺陷 1, Flaws in evidence 论据中的问题 1) Problems about surveys 调查类问题 Procedure of a typical survey 分子群体 (sub-groups) 确定子群体比例 (percentage) 随机取样 (Randomly select sample) A, selective sample 选择性样本 Example 1: A 137 Many teachers were actually excluded from the survey. The result of the survey lacks credibility because…… The result of the survey lacks credibility because the arguer fails to include teachers in other subjects. The result of the survey lacks credibility, therefore could not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. Cause-effect fallacy The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between A and B. Example 2: A 108 Without detailed information about the subscribers of ‘Cheese of the World’, we cannot determine whether they are representative of all consum

文档评论(0)

juhui05 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档