Scenario10–Feature-basedMachining.pptVIP

Scenario 10 - Feature-based machining Boeing’s AP238 (STEP-NC)Early Implementation Study “Dumb CNC” Problems Not Portable Unique data must be generated for each machine control combination on which the part is to be run Not Adaptable No information is provided to the machine to help it adapt to real-time changes in machining dynamics and machine tool alignment. Target - “Smart CNC” Cutter movement data, instead of axis movement data is sent to the CNC. Sophisticated CNCs have the capability of converting cutter movement data to axis movement data. High level information about the part features, materials, cutters, and dimensional tolerances can also be sent to the CNC. This information should be sent using a data standard such as: AP238 “STEP-NC”. Dumb vs. Smart Smart CNC Benefits: Portability Portable Cutter motion data is “machine neutral” and may be used directly by machines with different geometries Separate post-processors are not required for each unique control/machine combination Direct portability between machine tools/controls is possible (within reason) Portability Issues Data that is presently sent to a CNC is not portable for two main reasons: No standard format followed (a bad reason) Machine geometries vary (used to be a good reason) Machine auxiliary functions are not implemented in a consistent, standard manner Tool Motion Vs. Axis Motion “Dumb CNC” Data Flow Smart CNC Data Flow: Transitional Smart CNC Data Flow: Final Test Part for Demonstration A Dumb CNC Scenario #1 Due to increases in rate, an existing machine is no longer able to support required workload. The machine is no longer manufactured, or it is desired to purchase a similar machine from a different manufacturer or with a different control. Because the MCD data sent to the machines is non-portable, a separate set of MCD data must be kept and supported for the new machine A Wide Data Path Other information about the part can be transmitted using AP238 Fixtures Mat