Benefitsofaddinganactiveclamptoasynchronousflyback.PDFVIP

Benefitsofaddinganactiveclamptoasynchronousflyback.PDF

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Benefitsofaddinganactiveclamptoasynchronousflyback.PDF

Benefits of adding an active clamp to a synchronous flyback power supply By John Betten and Brian King, Texas Instruments Incorporated Flyback converters are a popular choice in applications that require an isolated power supply to deliver low to medium output power. When efficiency is a primary concern, you can replace the flyback output diode with a MOSFET, resulting in what is commonly referred to as a synchronous flyback converter. POE (power-over-Ethernet) applications are prime candidates for synchronous flyback supplies. Presently, the input power for POE supplies is limited to 12.95W. Maximizing the efficiency of the power supply allows the system to deliver more power to the load. You can gain further improvements to the converter’s efficiency by using an active-clamp controller to reduce the snubber and shoot-through losses. Active-clamp forward converters have been an increasingly popular choice in higher power applications. Yet few power-supply designers are aware that they can also employ an active clamp in flyback converters. To investigate the benefits of the active- clamp control in a flyback topology, we designed, built, and tested two power supplies to the specification shown in Table 1. Both power supplies use synchronous rectification on the secondary, but one uses the power transformer to drive the synchronous FET; the other uses a gate-drive transformer and also implements an active clamp. The POE input requirements inspired the specifications, but we extended the input range to cover telecom applications. In the interest of a fair comparison, we kept major components not affected by the differences in the two approaches identical in both designs. Figure 1 shows photos of each circuit. We also kept component placement and layout common for both boards. The most noticeable difference between the two circuits is the addition of a gate-drive transformer in the active-clamp circuit. Paramet

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档