creative leadership strongprocessesstrong in project team development an.pdfVIP

creative leadership strongprocessesstrong in project team development an.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
creative leadership strongprocessesstrong in project team development an

British Journal of Management, Vol. 11, 273–283 (2000) Creative Leadership Processes in Project Team Development: An Alternative to Tuckman’s Stage Model Tudor Rickards and Susan Moger Manchester Business School, Booth Street West, Manchester M15 6PB, UK We propose that theories of project team development and of creativity can be integrated into a new conceptual framework. The framework proposes two structural barriers that bear on team performance, and modifies the well-established team develop- ment model of Tuckman. Creative leadership is suggested as an important means of breaching the barriers. Its differentiating feature seems to be its effectiveness in estab- lishing protocols that sustain the creative efforts of team members. We have designated the protocols ‘benign structures’. Empirical evidence is provided from a range of studies of project teams in industrial settings. Introduction enthusiasm for project teams as the route to high performance has been captured in a multitude of While our conjectures on team development popular and scholarly books, despite warnings potentially address issues for a wide range of of imprecise terminology regarding groups and social groups, we have focused attention on pro- teams (e.g. Katzenbach and Smith, 1993; Payne, ject teams, as a simple yet important subset for 1990). There have also been criticisms that the empirical study. Project teams have become a work has tend

文档评论(0)

616366433 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档