- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
1
Finding social roles in Wikipedia 1
Howard T. Welser, Dan Cosley, Gueorgi Kossinets,
Austin Lin, Fedor Dokshin, Geri Gay, and Marc Smith
Abstract:
The concept of social role has long been used in social science describe the intersection of behavioral,
meaningful, and structural attributes that emerge regularly in particular settings and institutions. We use
structural signature methods to identify key roles in a large distributed collaboration system (Wikipedia)
by examining the distribution of edits across types of pages and the structure of relationships between
editors. We distinguish between technical editors, substantive experts, vandal fighters, and social
networkers and demonstrate key ways that their patterns of interaction and contribution differ. We
conclude by considering how differential entry into and retention in particular roles may affect the
operation of the large social system.
1. Introduction
It is difficult to gauge the social significance of Wikipedia, other than to say that, like Google,
Wikipedia has forever changed how we use, find and think about information. Both pundits (like
Stephen Colbert) and researchers (Stvilia et al. 2005, Giles 2005) have been pre-occupied with the
question of whether the product of Wikipedia is of sufficient quality, or whether its pages constitute
legitimate references (Read 2006). Others argue that the project will never achieve a sufficient level of
quality relying on non-expert volunteers of unknown identity (Chesney). Instead of prognosticating
about the potential of the Wikipedia project we contend that scholars should be more focused on
understanding how Wikipedia has achieved the success that it has: a “pretty good” resource for a basic
您可能关注的文档
- Fatigue Crack strongGrowth Ratestrong and Stress-Intensity Factor.pdf
- FATIGUE STRENGTH OF SHEAR CONNECTORS.pdf
- Fatty acid composition and physicochemical properties of.pdf
- Fatty Acid Desaturation and the Regulation of Adiposity in.pdf
- Fatty Acid Export from the Chloroplast. Molecular.pdf
- Fault weakening and earthquake instability by powder.pdf
- Fawkes and the Creation ofPostmodern Anarchism.pdf
- FAWN A Fast Array of Wimpy Nodes - CMU Computer Science.pdf
- FDA Regulation on the Importation of Prescription Drugs.pdf
- FDI, Exports and strongEconomicstrong Growth Evidence from Mena Region.pdf
文档评论(0)