抗辩权略关于.pdfVIP

抗辩权略论 中文摘要 抗辩权略论 中文摘要 民事权利以其效力不同可分为支配权、请求权、形成权和抗辩权。抗辩权，是对 抗请求权的一项权利。在法学家的努力下，德国民法典首次确立抗辩权概念，这对抗 辩权的发展以及民事权利体系的完善具有里程碑意义。目前我国学界对抗辩权的研究 侧重于对具体抗辩权制度的探讨，理论研究尚不深入,故本文系统介绍抗辩权的若干 基本问题，并对抗辩权制度的基本规则加以梳理，以期呈现出清晰、系统、完整的抗 辩权制度。 本文重点研究了事实抗辩与抗辩权的关系，明确了两者最大区别在于：事实抗辩 要么使请求权不能成立，要么使已经成立的请求权归于消灭；而抗辩权并不阻碍请求 权的成立，只是对其行使进行不同程度的限制。此外，事实抗辩法官有职权主动审查； 而抗辩权的行使则完全依赖于权利人自己。 在抗辩权与请求权的关系上，抗辩权仅仅是 “对抗”或 “妨碍”请求权的行使， 而不是 “否认”请求权有效成立；抗辩权的对抗对象是请求权，而不是一切权利；抗 辩权的客体是救济性请求权，而不是权能性请求权。抗辩权与形成权是两种不同的权 利类型，不可混为一谈。 关键词：抗辩权；事实抗辩；请求权；形成权 作者：曹蓉蓉 指导老师：章正璋 I Abstract The right of defense The right of defense Abstract According to different efficacy, civil rights can be divided into right of dominion, right of claim, right of formation, and right of defense. The right of defense is a civil right which qualify someone to refuse the claim proposedthe base of claim right. With the help of Pandecten system of civil law the right of defense was made in Germany Civil Code, for the development of the right of defense and civil rights system it has milepost significance. At present, Scholars in China pay more attention to concrete defense system, and ignore the basic theory of defense. This dissertation gives an introduction to the fundamental issues of right of defense and hackles the basic rules of defense system, tries to present a clear、systemic and complete view about it. I pay more attention to the relationship between defense and right of defense. The grea