营养支持治疗解析.pptVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
确定蛋白质需要量 1g氮=6.25g 蛋白质 正常蛋白质需要量 ? 1.0-1.5 g/kg/d 有应激因素时,×系数 所需能量(kcal/150)=所需含氮量,或 6.25 ×(kcal/150)=所需蛋白质量 供给的能量中糖脂之比为1:1 糖的供给量:4 mg/Kg/min; 6 g/Kg/d 脂的供给量:1.0-1.5 g/Kg/d 确定糖和脂肪的需要量 供给的能量中糖脂之比为1:1 糖的供给量:4 mg/Kg/min; 6 g/Kg/d 脂的供给量:1.0-1.5 g/Kg/d 确定糖和脂肪的需要量 营养性高碳酸血症-肺部疾病营养支持时 最主要的代谢并发症1 高脂配方可降低机械通气病人 的呼吸商,避免高碳酸血症的发生 徐甲芬等.肺病专用低糖类营养配方对呼吸衰竭病人的影响肠外与肠内营养,2004;11:4:202-204 决定经肠道还是肠道外营养 尽可能经肠道内营养 即使经肠道营养不能满足能量所需,尽可能经肠道补充部分营养 经肠外补充不足量 Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Support in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Adult patients Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2003, 27: 355-373 Clinical trials were assigned “level 1” if randomization was concealed, outcome adjudication was blinded, and an intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Trials were assigned “level 2” if any 1 of the above characteristics was unfulfilled. For each intervention that had 2 similar studies to estimate the common risk ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for death and infectious complications. The common risk ratios and their CIs were estimated using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird as implemented in Revman 4.1. We considered p0.25 to be supportive of a trend and p0.05 to be statistically significant. Language of summary recommendations Conditions Language of recommendation If there were no reservations “Strongly recommended” about endorsing an intervention If evidence was supportive but “Recommended” there were minor uncertainties about the safety, feasibility, or costs of the intervention If the supportive evidence was “Should be considered” weak and/or there were major uncertainties about the safety, feasibility, or costs of the intervention If there was either inadequate or No recommendation ,ie, conflicting evidence

文档评论(0)

武神赵子龙 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档