标准参照式评估与目的匹配的评价.ppt

评价大纲（Assessment Scheme） 评价大纲包括 评价手段与成果匹配性的陈述 成果-交付对照表 必须尽早向学生详细解释评价策略 尽早提出评语 讨论：单元评分(Atomic Scoring)的局限 表现类评分 成品(Products) 例：The shelled prototype is sturdy, but there are defects that hamper the overall visual and functional quality (OC2) 例：There is a gross difference between the technical drawing and the shelled prototype (OC3) 行为 (Processes) 例： There were attempts to explore and synthesize formal variations, as a result, despite not equally pleasing from all angles, the form was interesting overall. (OC4) 第三方评价(Peer-evaluation) 例： All key character curves and datum points are captured and recorded, allowing others to recreate the design in CAD without loosing the design intents.(OC5) 多交付综合评分量表 A The project fulfils all criteria of B grade (OC1,2,3). The prototyping process is inventive or is a combination of existing methods in an ingenious way, leading to high quality end result. B The design process is completed smoothly, prototyping options were compared critically in terms of aesthetics, speed, and manufacturing constrains (OC1). The shelled prototype is sturdy, the pieces fit together snugly, the surfaces flowed smoothly and the clock function normally (OC2). The technical drawing is well organised (OC3). C The design process is completed smoothly, although there are some minor distractions along the way (OC1) The shelled prototype is sturdy, but there are defects that hamper the overall visual and functional quality (OC2). The technical drawing closely resemble the shelled prototype (OC3). D The design project is completed and all deliverables submitted (OC1). The prototype is assembled, but it is too fragile and unstable for design evaluation and presentation (OC2). There is a gross difference between the technical drawing and the shelled prototype (OC3). F Not all deliverables are submitted, the design process has no focus, and there is no articulation between different steps. 优异表现 部分学习成果超越预期 符合预期 取得全部学习成果 低于预期 取得部分学习成果 不及格 未取得学习成果 杰出表现