【创新设计】2015-2016学年高二英语外研版选修六课件：Module 3 Period two Listening and Vocabulary2 .pptVIP

Module 3 Interpersonal Relationships – Friendship Twenty-year-old Liao Mei is an only child. Since the age of 11, she has had a best friend called Wang Chaosu. They get on very well because they both have very lively personalities and have a great interest in books. They have quarreled seriously three times but each time they have made up and become best friends again, Liao Mei really regrets these quarrels. Even when the two girls went to different colleges at the age of 18, they kept in touch through email and still stayed best friends. Fill in the blanks We are all ____________ in our families so we often feel lonely in our insides. We need __________ who ___________ in the same things to talk about our personal matters and this is important to us. So we should _________ with each other. If we quarreled with a friend about something, we should ________ as soon as possible. In order to keep friends, we should ____________ with our friends but never _________. 1) They have “quite” lively personalities (not “very”). 2) They share an interest in “sport” (not “books”). 3) They have quarreled “ from time to time” (not “three times”). 4) Liao Mei regrets “their one serious quarrel” (not “these quarrels”). 5) They are no longer “best friends”(just “good friends”). 1 Why has Liao Mei never felt lonely? Because her parents always made sure she had friends to play with. 2 Where did the two girls meet? At secondary school. 3 Where did they live? Very near each other. 1 Where is Liao Mei’s college? 200 kilometers away. 2 What does Liao Mei say you need to do to keep your friends? Keep in touch. 3 How many friends has Liao Mei lost touch with? Four or five. 4 Why has she lost touch with them? Because they changed. * * lively quarrel make up regret keep in touch lose touch with adj.活泼的，有生气的 v.n.吵架 和好，和解 v.后悔，悔恨 保持联系 与……失去联系 Words Preview Do you think that good friends should never quarrel? Discussion 1 Are Liao Mei and Wang Chaosu still friends? Yes, they are. 2 Why d