我国管辖权异议制度实务研究.pdfVIP

Abstract Abstract Along with the social economy and the rapid development of civilization, peoples legal consciousness also enhances unceasingly. People began to more and more knowing law, also more and more willing to solve dispute to court, with public power safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. Court cases increasing, also make the problems existing in the legal system unceasingly highlighting. Just objects to the jurisdiction system for, in litigation, jurisdiction certainty is proceeding startup priority, and its is very important. But because our countrys legislation and judicial interpretation is not perfect, make objects to the jurisdiction system there are many defects, which causes the abuse of authority and court of local protectionism are rife. Objects to the jurisdiction system defects that procedural justice and substantive justice difficult to achieve, cannot fully protect the legal rights of parties. Although scholars have many perfect recommendations, but because Chinas long-term heavy entity light procedure idea influence, still put the system long not to perfect. Therefore the author strives to from practice Angle, to the jurisdiction of the opposition system are proposed perfect recommendations. For objects to the jurisdiction of the theoretical concept, the author has many viewpoints on himself and became a variety of objects to the jurisdiction of the concept that understanding, some opinions are put forward. Objects to the jurisdiction of the proposed system establishment condition and value, theorists have no dispute, the author also explained them, make the content more complete. This paper based on objects