- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
3._The_Heap_英文版_悖论_逻辑学教材
The Paradoxes of Eubulides of Miletus (4th century B.C.)
3. The Heap
(a.k.a. The Bald Man, a.k.a. The Sorites Paradox)
I. The Paradox
Consider this obvious truth: addition of 1 kernel of wheat is too insignificant to turn what is not a heap of wheat into a heap of wheat and, similarly, subtraction of 1 kernel of wheat is too insignificant to turn what is a heap of wheat into what is not a heap of wheat.
The obvious truth has the paradoxical consequences shown by the following Soritical
argument:
1. 1 grain of wheat is not a heap.
2. If 1 grain of wheat is not a heap, then 2 grains of wheat are not a heap.
[by the obvious truth]
3. If 2 grains of wheat are not a heap, then 3 grains of wheat are not a heap.
[by the obvious truth]
.
.
.
10,000. If 9,999 grains of wheat are not a heap, then 10,000 grains are not a heap.
[by the obvious truth]
Therefore, 10,000 grains of wheat are not a heap.
The argument is valid. (In effect, it just uses 10,000 applications of the truth-preserving inference rule modus ponens.) And, its premises all seem to be true: (1) is clearly true; (2) is true by the obvious truth that addition of 1 little kernel can’t turn a non-heap into a heap; and (3)-(10,000) are true for the same reason. But, the conclusion is obviously false. So, the paradox here is, again, a seemingly sound argument with a false conclusion.
II. The Heart of the Matter
The heart of the Heap paradox is captured in three assertions each of which seems true:
a. small changes don’t make for a difference in the application of soritical predicates like
‘…is a heap’ or ‘…is bald.’
b. large changes do make for a difference in the application of such predicates,
c. a large change is nothing more than a large number of small changes.
But as the Soritical argument seems to show, the triad (a)-(c) is inconsistent, i.e., all of its members cannot be true together.
III. Formal
您可能关注的文档
- 【2013惠州四调】广东省惠州市2013届高三4月模拟考试政治试题Word版含答案.doc
- 【2013备考】高考数学各地名校试题解析分类汇编(一)2函数3文.doc
- 2014年昆明事业单位招聘考试如何零基础提高分数试题四.doc
- 【2013河西二模】天津市河西区2013届高三总复习质量检测(二)化学Word版含答案.doc
- 【2014-03-15】Z集团绩效驱动下的项目总控计划管理.docx
- 2014年昆明教师公开招聘考试全真模拟试题及答案二.doc
- 2014年昆明教师公开招聘考试全真模拟试题及答案四.doc
- 【2014高考调研】(新课标名校调研)北师大版英语(高三总复习)阶段测试(八).doc
- 2014年昆明教师公开招聘考试全真模拟试题及答案五.doc
- 【2014泰安市一模】英语_Word版含答案.doc
文档评论(0)