3F4OptimalTransmitandReceiveFiltering.pptVIP

3F4 Optimal Transmit and Receive Filtering Dr. I. J. Wassell. Transmission System The FT of the received pulse is, Transmission System Where, HC(w) is the channel frequency response, which is often fixed, but is beyond our control HT(w) and HR(w), the transmit and receive filters can be designed to give best system performance How should we choose HT(w) and to HR(w) give optimal performance? Optimal Filters Suppose a received pulse shape pR(t) which satisfies Nyquist’s pulse shaping criterion has been selected, eg, RC spectrum The FT of pR(t) is PR(w), so the received pulse spectrum is, H(w)=k PR(w), where k is an arbitrary positive gain factor. So, we have the constraint, Optimal Filters For binary equiprobable symbols, Optimal Filters Optimal Filters For binary PAM with transmitted levels A1 and A2 and zero ISI we have, Optimal Filters Noise Power, The PSD of the received noise at the slicer is, Optimal Filters We now wish to express the gain term, k, in terms of the energy of the transmitted pulse, hT(t) Optimal Filters So, Optimal Filters We wish to minimise, Optimal Filters Schwartz inequality states that, Optimal Filters So we obtain, Optimal Filters Since l is arbitrary, let l=1, so, Optimal Filters Looking at the filters Dependent on pulse shape PR(w) selected Combination of HT(w) and HR(w) act to cancel channel response HC(w) HT(w) raises transmitted signal power where noise level is high (a kind of pre-emphasis) HR(w) lowers receive gain where noise is high, thereby ‘de-emphasising’ the noise. Note that the signal power has already been raised by HT(w) to compensate. Optimal Filters The usual case is ‘white’ noise where, Optimal Filters Clearly both |HT(w)| and |HR(w)| are proportional to, Optimal Filters If |HC(w)|=1, ie an ideal channel, then in Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN), Optimal Filters In practice, the phase responses are chosen to ensure that the overall system response is linear, ie we have constant group delay with frequency (no phase di