人文學資源報告.pptVIP

第一組The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship 圖資三 黃紹軒 圖資二 郭家寧 圖資二 劉威廷 圖資二 周依蝶 圖資二 謝宇昇 Prices for and numbers of journals in the sciences and in technical and medical fields have increased exponentially over the last two decades, strangling library budgets and making measures such as cancellation programs for serials 期刊的價格為何以及數量在最後的二十年對於科學技術和醫療領域以指數的方式規律增加，抑制了圖書館的預算以及做了測量像是節目普遍的連續取消。 Another significant effect of the crisis has been what some have called “the ‘death’ of the scholarly monograph in the humanities 而另一個對於危機重大的影響則是”死亡是人文學科的學術性專題論文”。 libraries have smaller and smaller funds available to purchase books in all fields. Anna H. Perrault found that there was a 27.76 % decline in the total number of non-serial imprints acquired. 圖書館的資金則會越來越少來購買任何領域的書籍。Anna H. Perrault發現將1989年與1985年圖書館研究學會資料比較，指出對於所有並非連續性的版本說明取得有27.76 %的衰落 Lindsay Waters reported that 30 years ago college and university libraries would buy 1,250 to 1,500 copies of any book “that had successfully gone through the rigorous scholarly review process” by a publisher. Now publishers can expect to sell only about 275 copies worldwide Lindsay Waters，則指出三十年前，學院和大學圖書館均會購買按照出版者所有書的1,250至1,500的書籍拷貝本”順利的審核了嚴謹的學術回顧”。現在出版者在這世界只能夠期望賣出275本拷貝本。 Libraries are unable to buy many scholarly books and publishers cannot continue publishing them 圖書館並不能購買過多的學術性書籍以及出版者不能夠繼續出版的 humanities collections seem to be more at risk than those in other disciplines. Perrault found that the decline in the number of monograph titles acquired by ARL libraries between 1985 and 1989 was highest in the humanities at 31.98%, compared to 28.88% for the social sciences and 15.81% for the sciences 人文學科的搜藏相較於其他學科似乎是比較有風險的。Perrault發現在1985年和1989年之間，專題論文標題數量的衰落在ARL圖書館的獲取是最高的，在人文學科高達31.98%，相較於社會科學的28.88%以及科學的15.81%。 humanists tend to work alone rather than collaboratively, and their research is characterized by an individual approach, in which “the individual scholar’s interpretation is p