被害人虚假陈述案的刑法技术方案.doc

被害人虚假陈述案的刑法分析 上海政法大学 王凯 摘 要 在刑事诉讼中，证据是灵魂和基础，其中之一的被害人陈述是为重中之重。追究犯罪活动一般从被害人陈述开始，认定犯罪嫌疑人被告人罪与非罪的证据也常源于此。一般来说，被害人陈述应是客观真实的，然而作为一种主观上的陈述，有时真实性与虚假性往往是并存的。司法实践中，被害人出于种种原因，在配合司法机关调查取证时做出了违背客观事实的虚假陈述，本案也正是如此。金某原为受害人，却在数额较大的财物被盗后，为加重犯罪嫌疑人的罪行，向司法机关报案时故意夸大犯罪事实并指使他人作伪证，该案在审理时就引发了不少争议。首先是金某的行为究竟是否构成犯罪，而在法院作出有罪判决后，争议的焦点又集中在了究竟是构成诬告陷害罪还是伪证罪，或是另行成立其他犯罪。文章在结合案例和司法实践中对此类案件的处理进行深度剖析的基础上，最终对金某的行为予以了认定。 文章分为以下三个部分：第一部分：案情介绍及争议焦点。对金某案进行介绍根据法院的判决，进而引出本案争议的焦点。本案的争议焦点包括：1金某的行为是否构成犯罪。2金某的行为应如何认定。第二部分：对本案的争议焦点进行具体分析。结合本案，运用刑法学的相关理论对被害人虚假陈述案的争议焦点进行分析，然后结合案例就有关的理论提出自己的理解和观点，最后对法院作出判决的合法性合理性进行评析。第三部分：本案引发的思考。通过对金某案的分析研究，引出目前我国相关法律规定的缺失，并结合当前司法实践，就此类案件处理提出自己的些许建议。 关键词：被害人虚假陈述，诬告陷害，伪证，妨害作证 RESEARCH ON THE FALSE STATEMENTS OF VICTIM Abstract The evidence is the soul and foundation of false statements of the victim is one of the most important in criminal proceedings. Investigated for criminal activities generally begin with statements from victims, found evidence of crime or the suspect accused often stems from this. In general, the victim should be objective and true statement, but as a subjective statement, sometimes truth and falsity are often co-exist. Judicial practice, the victims for various reasons, in the investigation with the judiciary has made false statements contrary to the objective facts of the present case is true. Jin original victims, but in the larger amounts of stolen property, as aggravating suspects, deliberately exaggerating when crimes reported to the judicial authorities and ordered others to commit perjury, during the hearing on the case raised no less controversial. The first is whether a particular act constitutes a crime gold, but after the guilty verdict in court, the focus of controversy has focused on what constitutes the crime of false accusation or perjury, or otherwise set up other crimes. Based on the article with case and judicial practice of dealing with such cases in-depth analysis of the final act of a metal to be a recognized. The article is d