- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green Introduction What is biomass? Why calculate GHG benefits The Carbon Cycle Options for biomass How are GHG benefits calculated Life Cycle Analysis Case Studies What is biomass? Accumulates in living vegetation following photosynthesis Important pool in the carbon cycle Exists in many forms Contributes to other pools within the global system The Carbon Budget Greenhouse gas mitigation options Fuel for Energy Dedicated Sources (i.e. by-products of other activities) Dependant Sources (i.e. energy crops grown specifically for food) Carbon Sink Wood Products Fuel for Energy Long use history (i.e. centuries) Currently contributes 14% to the global energy requirements More efficient use through modern technology Solid liquid and gas Capable of replacing all fossil fuel energy forms Fuel for Energy (cont.) Carbon Sink Recent Policy has focused on this option Kyoto Protocol Article 3.3 Increase carbon stock in various pools Aboveground / belowground and soil Time Dependant Land use change Carbon Stock Dynamics Wood Products Product replacement Sink Fuel at end of life Why calculate GHG benefits Analyse potential Quantify benefits Compare options Quality decision Life cycle analysis considerations Constraints Must compare systems within same system boundary Bioenergy Case Study 1 Bioenergy Case Study 2a Ethanol production in Brazil vs United States Potential CO2 emissions avoided Brazil 5.6 MtC/yr United States 0.59 MtC/yr Bioenergy Bioenergy output to fossil energy input Forestry and agriculture (25-50 : 1) Liquid energy (4-5 : 1) Source: Marland, 1999 Bioenergy Case Study 2b Canada: Total Forest Ecosystem Carbon Modelling (1920 - 1995) Case Study - Sink Typical radiata pine regime Case Study – Wood Products 1 kilometre of transmission line Life 60 years Including disposal Case Study – Wood Products Preferential Use The second option is incr
原创力文档


文档评论(0)