narr_NCL文集.pptVIP

NCEP Regional ReanalysisFedor Mesinger1, Geoff DiMego2, Eugenia Kalnay3, Perry Shafran4, Wesley Ebisuzaki5, Dusan Jovic4, Jack Woollen4, Kenneth Mitchell2, Eric Rogers2, Michael Ek1, Yun Fan6, Robert Grumbine2, Wayne Higgins5, Hong Li3, Ying Lin2, Geoff Manikin2, David Parrish2, and Wei Shi6 1NCEP/EMC and UCAR, 2NCEP/EMC, 3Univ. of MD, 4NCEP/EMC and SAIC/GSO, 5NCEP/CPC, 6NCEP/CPC and RSISNARR Users Workshop, San Diego, 11 January 2005 Goal/ Motivation Create long-term set of consistent climate data on a regional scale for the North American domain Use of the GR to drive the Regional Reanalysis (RR) system Superior to NCEP/NCAR Global Reanalysis (GR) due to: Use of a regional model (the Eta Model); Advances in modeling and data assimilation since 1995, especially: Precipitation assimilation Direct assimilation of radiances Land-surface model updates NARR Support NOAA Office of Global Programs (OGP) GAPP: GEWEX America Prediction Project NCEP (EMC and CPC) Computational Resources / IT Staff Staff scientific and technical expertise Science Steering Committee J. Roads, Chair NCDC, UCAR public access to NARR database System Design Fully cycled 3-hr EDAS (Eta Data Assimilation System) Lateral boundary conditions supplied by Global Reanalysis 2 Resolution: 32-km, 45 layers RR time period: 1979-2003 (continued later in near-real time, as in CDAS) ? Free forecasts out to 72 hr every 2.5 days, using GR2 forecast boundary conditions (“reforecasts”) Data Used in Global Reanalysis and Regional Reanalysis It was a lot of work / There were problems to solve: Acquire, or create (improved reprocessing) a variety of datasets, e.g., TOVS-1B data for 1979-2002 time period; Air Force snow depth dataset; High (RR) resolution sea and lake ice, and sea and lake surface temperatures; Precipitation data (Mexico, Canada, CMAP), processing (PRISM/”Mountain Mapper”), disaggregation to hourly; Improvements/ refinements of various components of EDAS, e.g., Preci