中美轮胎特保案研究.docVIP

目 录 1引言 1 1.1选题的背景与目的 1 1.2研究方法与技术路线 2 2美国轮胎特保案由来及其过程 2 2.1案件背景 2 2.2案件发展过程 3 2.3案件结果及其反响 3 3美国实施轮胎特保的原因分析 4 3.1金融危机背景下，美国贸易保护主义抬头 4 3.2美国政治体制的运作是其对华实施贸易保护政策的政治原因 4 3.3我国轮胎产能较差、出口结构不合理，部分轮胎产品技术含量低 5 3.4中国对美贸易冲突回击力度不够 5 4轮胎特保措施的负面影响 5 4.1加剧中美贸易摩擦 5 4.2影响世界经济复苏 6 4.3轮胎特保措施将引起国内市场的激烈争夺和工人失业 6 5轮胎特保案对中国的警示 6 5.1轮胎特保案与贸易保护主义 6 5.2轮胎特保案与中国轮胎制造升级 7 5.3轮胎特保案与贸易争端的应对 7 6轮胎特保案的应对选择 8 6.1加强政治领域的沟通与合作 8 6.2发挥行业协会的作用 8 6.3根据WTO准则解决轮胎特保案 9 6.4积极开拓内需市场 9 6.5适度的报复措施遏制对方的贸易保护主义倾向 10 6.6建立健全出口市场预警机制 10 7.结束语 11 致谢 13 Abstract Currently, the United States has become Chinas second largest trading partner and second largest export market. With the deepening and development of Sino-US economic exchanges, the United States trade deficit with China showing a growing trend of Sino-US trade friction occur frequently. The tires safeguard is U.S. International Trade Commission to make recommendations on June 29, 2009, Chinese exports to the U.S. passenger car and light truck tires for three consecutive years were imposed 55%, 45% and 35% ad valorem special tariffs . According to the program, September 11, 2009, U.S. President Barack Obama decided to impose restrictions on Chinese tires safeguard tariffs period of three years. December 13, 2010, the WTO rejected Chinas off tire imposition of anti-dumping complaints of punitive tariffs, the arbitration panel said the United States in September 2009 China sales tire adopt a transitional nature protection measures by imposing punitive The tariff does not violate WTO rules. September 5, 2011, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled that China lost. For Sino-US tire special safeguard case study, this paper first introduces the background and the main process of Sino-US tire special safeguard case, followed by the introduction of barriers to trade policy of the United States, and finally proposed for the solution to the problem, and to make an objective evaluation. Keywords：Tire safeguard case Barriers to trade The