第二小组边界单元法.pptVIP

1-* The BCM approach is attractive mainly because of its further reduction of computational model dimensions and simplification of the integration. The savings in preprocessing of the simulations are clear. Treatment of fractures and material non-homogeneity has not been studied in BCM; these may limit its applications to rock mechanics problems considering the present state-of the-art. Boundary Contour Method 1-* Boundary Node Method The method is a combination of traditional BEM with a meshless technique using the moving least squares for establishing trial functions without an explicit mesh of boundary elements. It further simplifies the mesh generation tasks. Its applications concentrate on shape sensitivity analysis at present and solution of potential problems, but can be extended to general geomechanics problems, especially groundwater flow and stress/deformation analysis. 1-* Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method The traditional technique to deal with such domain integrals is the division of the domain into a number of internal cells, which will seriously compromise the advantages of BEM’s ‘‘boundary only’’ discretization. Different techniques have been developed to overcome this difficulty. The DRM has a unified approach to treat different source terms and initial fields, the numerical efficiency has significant influence on the suitability and efficiency of BEM for problems of material non-homogeneity and non-linearity. (DRBEM) 1-* The BEM methods as a whole is less efficient in treatment of material non-homogeneity and non-linearity compared with FEM and FVM, despite the fact that a limited number of multiple sub-regions of different material properties can be efficiently handled in BEM. However, it is much more efficient in simulating fracturing process (initiation, growth and coalescence) in elastic solids. It is therefore not surprising that BEM is most often applied for stress analysis problems, or fracturing process simulation, and is used for