Guidelines Presentation - International Le.PPTVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Treatment of Epileptic Seizures with AEDs Elinor Ben-Menachem, MD, PhD Institution for Clinical Neuroscience Sahlgrenska Academy Sahlgrenska University Hospital G?teborg, Sweden Guideline Development Overview of activities Guideline Development Find the evidence Define inclusion/exclusion criteria Search clinical question + inclusion/exclusion criteria Potential sources to search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Current Contents) Cochrane library published literature/references unpublished data English/non-English studies Perform multiple searches Guideline Development – 2 Abstract, Analyze and Grade/Rate the evidence Specific relevant variables as measure of quality “Major” variables Randomization Control group Masked outcome assessment Adequate comparator (assay sensitivity) Adequate enrollment to detect difference Minimal detectable difference Guideline Development – 3 Abstract, Analyze and Grade/Rate the evidence “Minor” variables Primary outcome clearly defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria clearly defined Equivalent treatment groups at baseline Adequate duration of assessment Drop out rate and how it is handled statistically Summarize abstraction/analysis into tabular form Evidence tables Guideline Development – 3 Abstract, Analyze and Grade/Rate the evidence Grading/rating scale based on relevant variables Usually four categories Top group – RCTs with best evidence, meet all criteria Next group – RCTs missing some “minor” criteria Third group – Trial missing some “major” criteria Last group – Low quality trials missing most or all “major” criteria OR only expert opinion Significant variability in grading/rating scales across guidelines Guideline Development Translate evidence and develop recommendations Usually 4 or 5 levels of recommendations Levels defined using output of grading/rating scale At least one recommendation per question Develop algorithm (if possible) Validate guideline Internal/External Peer rev

文档评论(0)

sd7f8dgh + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档